Impact of PGT-A versus conventional IVF/ICSI on pregnancy outcomes in recurrent spontaneous abortion patients: a cohort study stratified by age, number of miscarriages, and previous chromosomal abnormalities in miscarried embryos
10.3760/cma.j.cn101441-20241021-00381
- VernacularTitle:PGT-A与传统IVF/ICSI技术对RSA患者的妊娠结局影响：基于年龄、流产次数及流产组织染色体分析的队列研究
- Author:
Xiran CHEN
1
;
Hui CHEN
1
;
Xiaohui JI
1
;
Ping YUAN
1
Author Information
1. 中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院生殖中心 广东省妇产疾病临床医学研究中心，广州 510120
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Reproductive technologies, assisted;
Recurrent spontaneous abortion;
Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies;
Reproductive outcome
- From:
Chinese Journal of Reproduction and Contraception
2025;45(5):495-502
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To analyze whether there are differences in reproductive outcomes between preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A) and conventional in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection and embryo transfer (IVF/ICSI-ET) in patients with recurrent spontaneous abortion (RSA). Methods:A retrospective cohort study was conducted at the Reproductive Center of Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, including RSA patients who underwent assisted reproductive technology (ART) between January 2018 and June 2023. Patients were categorized into two groups based on the type of ART, the PGT-A group (78 patients, 100 embryo transfer cycles) and the IVF/ICSI group (95 patients, 105 embryo transfer cycles). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to compare the impact of these two techniques on reproductive outcomes. Further analysis was conducted to evaluate the effects of maternal age, number of miscarriages, and previous chromosomal abnormalities in miscarried embryos on pregnancy outcomes. The primary outcome measure was the live birth rate, while secondary outcomes included the pregnancy rate and the miscarriage rate.Results:The live birth rate in the PGT-A group [50.0% (50/100)] was higher than that in the IVF/ICSI group [37.1% (39/105)], while the miscarriage rate [20.6% (13/63)] was lower than that in the IVF/ICSI group [39.1% (25/64)], with both differences being statistically significant ( P=0.043, P=0.023). Among RSA patients aged 37-45 years with ≥3 miscarriages, the miscarriage rate in the PGT-A group (0%) was significantly lower than that in the IVF/ICSI group [46.2%(6/13), P=0.017], whereas the differences in live birth rate and pregnancy rate between the two groups were not statistically significant (all P>0.05). For RSA patients with previous chromosomal abnormalities in miscarried embryos, the miscarriage rate in the PGT-A group [21.1% (12/57)] was significantly lower than that in the IVF/ICSI group [71.4% (5/7), P=0.012]. Additionally, the pregnancy rate [66.3% (57/86)] and the live birth rate [52.3% (45/86)] in the PGT-A group were significantly higher than those in the IVF/ICSI group [33.3% (7/21), P=0.006; 9.5% (2/21), P<0.001]. Among 37-45 years patients, the miscarriage rate in the PGT-A group [5.9% (1/17)] was significantly lower than that in the IVF/ICSI group [38.7% (12/31), P=0.035], and the live birth rate [57.1% (16/28)] was significantly higher than that in the IVF/ICSI group [31.7% (19/60), P=0.023]. These differences were statistically significant. Conclusion:Compared with conventional IVF/ICSI-assisted reproduction, the use of PGT-A in RSA patients younger than 37 years, with or without a history of chromosomally normal miscarried embryos, did not significantly improve reproductive outcomes, regardless of whether they had experienced more than three miscarriages. However, for RSA patients with chromosomal abnormalities in miscarried embryos, PGT-A significantly reduced the miscarriage rate across the age range of 26-45 years. In RSA patients aged 37-45 years, PGT-A significantly improved reproductive outcomes. However, for patients with two miscarriages and a history of chromosomally normal miscarried embryos, the therapeutic benefit of PGT-A was limited.
