Application of functional exercise intervention in patients undergoing breast cancer surgery based on patient health participation model
10.3760/cma.j.cn211501-20240918-02535
- VernacularTitle:基于患者健康参与模型的功能锻炼干预在乳腺癌手术患者中的应用
- Author:
Ning SONG
1
;
Lijun YUAN
;
Ling CHEN
;
Yarou LIAO
;
Shouhua PENG
Author Information
1. 新疆医科大学护理学院，乌鲁木齐 830011
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Breast neoplasms;
Patient health engagement model;
Functional exercise;
Compliance
- From:
Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing
2025;41(15):1121-1129
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To construct a functional exercise intervention programme for breast cancer surgery patients and investigate the application effect, in order to provide a reference for improving patients′ postoperative functional exercise adherence based on the Patient Health Engagement (PHE) model.Methods:Using a randomised controlled trial method, 122 breast cancer surgery patients admitted to the First People′s Hospital of Tai′an were selected by convenience sampling from December 2023 to April 2024, and were divided into 61 cases each in the control group and the intervention group using the random number table method. The control group received routine intervention, while the intervention group received functional exercise intervention based on the PHE model on the basis of the control group, and the patients were observed on postoperative days 7, 30, and 60 days for the functional exercise adherence, health literacy, shoulder joint mobility and edema of the affected limb.Results:Each of the 2 groups eventually completed the study with 58 female cases with 3 cases fell off. The patients in the control group aged (54.84 ± 9.47) years. The patients in the intervention group aged (55.66 ± 7.29) years. After the intervention, the postoperative adherence scores of patients in the control group were (50.48 ± 4.87), (45.45 ± 4.44), and (41.93 ± 4.34) at 7, 30, and 60 days after surgery, respectively, which were lower than those of the intervention group (55.84 ± 3.98), (50.62 ± 3.87), (45.91 ± 4.09), the difference between two groups was significant ( t=-6.49, -6.69, -5.09, all P<0.05). There were statistically significant differences in adherence scores between groups, time and interactions ( F=40.48, 1 096.00, 7.14, all P<0.05). As for the healthy belief, the control group scored (80.22 ± 8.28), (82.84 ± 11.56), (86.79 ± 11.42), and (88.05 ± 11.06) before intervention, at 7, 30, and 60 days after surgery, and the difference in time was statistically significant when compared with the scores of the intervention group at the same time, which were (80.26 ± 9.08), (84.55 ± 9.52), (87.66 ± 7.97), and (89.31 ± 7.09) ( F=31.60, P<0.05). Shoulder mobility scores in the control group were (5.02 ± 1.16), (7.16 ± 1.23), (8.91 ± 1.08) at 7, 30, and 60 days after surgery, respectively, which were lower than those in the intervention group (6.02 ± 1.03), (7.69 ± 1.14), and (10.10 ± 1.05), the difference between two groups was significant ( t=-4.90, -2.43, -6.00, all P<0.05), and the differences in shoulder mobility scores among groups, time, and interaction were all statistically significant ( F=34.19, 558.40, 3.98, all P<0.05). At 60 days after surgery, a total of 2 cases (3.45%) of patients in the control group developed moderate or severe affected limb lymphedema and 0 cases in the intervention group, and the difference was statistically significant in comparison ( χ2=6.03, P<0.05). Conclusions:The functional exercise intervention based on the PHE model can effectively improve the functional exercise compliance and healthy belief of patients undergoing breast cancer surgery, reduce postoperative limb edema, improve shoulder joint motion, and promote postoperative recovery.
