Three-Dimensional Amide Proton Transfer Weighted Imaging Combined with Diffusion Weighted Imaging for Differentiating Benign and Malignant Bone Tumors
10.3969/j.issn.1005-5185.2025.09.017
- VernacularTitle:三维酰胺质子转移加权成像联合扩散加权成像鉴别良恶性骨肿瘤
- Author:
Ying LI
1
;
Cuiping REN
;
Wenhua ZHANG
;
Liangjie LIN
;
Yong ZHANG
Author Information
1. 郑州大学第一附属医院磁共振科,河南 郑州 450052
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Bone tumors;
Amide proton transfer weighted imaging;
Magnetic resonance imaging;
Diffusion weighted imaging;
Diagnosis,differential
- From:
Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging
2025;33(9):1004-1008
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Purpose To evaluate the diagnostic value of three-dimensional amide proton transfer weighted imaging(APTWI)in distinguishing benign from malignant bone tumors and the diagnostic efficacy of APTWI combined with diffusion-weighted imaging(DWI).Materials and Methods Sixty-nine patients with pelvic and lower extremity bone tumors,confirmed by puncture or surgical pathology at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University,were prospectively collected from April 2022 to July 2023.On the relevant parameter maps of APTWI and DWI,the asymmetric magnetization transfer rate at a chemical shift of 3.5 ppm[MTRasym(3.5 ppm)]and apparent diffusion coefficient(ADC)values corresponding to the lesions were measured,respectively.Comparative analysis of differences in each parameter was conducted,and the diagnostic efficacy of these parameters alone and in combination was compared.Results Among 69 bone tumor,24 were benign cases and 45 malignant cases.MTRasym(3.5 ppm)of malignant bone tumors was higher than that of benign tumors[(2.974±0.630)%vs.(2.215±0.963)%],while ADC values of malignant bone tumors were lower than those of benign tumors[(1.143±0.406)×10-3 s/mm2 vs.(1.757±0.449)×10-3 s/mm2],with significant differences between the two groups(t=3.532,-5.645;P<0.001).Receiver operating characteristic curve showed that MTRasym(3.5 ppm),ADC values,and their combination exhibited good performance in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant bone tumors,with the area under the curve being 0.765,0.841 and 0.874,respectively.There were no statistically significant differences in the area under the curve between the combined APTWI-DWI and either APTWI or DWI alone in diagnosing benign and malignant bone tumors(combined vs.APTWI:Z=1.873,P=0.064;combined vs.DWI:Z=1.333,P=0.167).The diagnostic specificity of combined APTWI-DWI was significantly higher than that of APTWI alone(96%vs.56%,P=0.001),but there was no statistically significant difference compared with DWI alone(96%vs.80%,P=0.189).Conclusion APTWI and DWI,either alone or in combination,could serve as effective imaging indicators for distinguishing benign from malignant bone tumors.The combination of APTWI and DWI shows a trend of achieving higher diagnostic efficacy and diagnostic specificity in differentiating benign from malignant bone tumors,thus holding potential clinical application value.
