Diagnostic Value of Coronary Slow Flow for Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction in Patients With Angina and Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries
10.3969/j.issn.1000-3614.2025.09.007
- VernacularTitle:冠状动脉慢血流现象对冠状动脉微循环障碍的诊断价值
- Author:
Zhaoxue SHENG
1
;
Yuhui HUANG
;
Xingliang LI
;
Jingyu WANG
;
Qiang CHEN
;
Wuqiang CHE
;
Zhen ZHANG
;
Xuecheng ZHAO
;
Shuoyan AN
;
Yanxiang GAO
;
Jingang ZHENG
Author Information
1. 中日友好医院 心脏科,北京 100029
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
coronary microvascular dysfunction;
coronary slow flow;
corrected thrombolysis in myocardial infarction frame count
- From:
Chinese Circulation Journal
2025;40(9):885-891
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objectives:Coronary slow flow(CSF)has long been regarded as a marker of coronary microvascular dysfunction(CMD).This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic value of CSF for CMD in patients with angina and nonobstructive coronary arteries(ANOCA).Methods:The study data were derived from the ANOCA-CMD prospective cohort study.All enrolled patients underwent coronary angiography and concurrent coronary physiological assessments in the left anterior descending artery using pressure-wire and thermodilution techniques to obtain coronary flow reserve(CFR)and the index of microcirculatory resistance(IMR).Based on the results,CMD was classified into four subtypes:CMD with elevated IMR(IMR≥25),CMD with reduced CFR(CFR<2.5),CMD with either reduced CFR or elevated IMR(CFR<2.5 or IMR≥25),and CMD with both reduced CFR and elevated IMR(CFR<2.5 and IMR≥25).The corrected thrombolysis in myocardial infarction(TIMI)frame count(CTFC)in the left anterior descending artery was calculated from coronary angiography images,with CSF defined as CTFC>27.This study evaluated the correlation between CTFC,CFR,and IMR,and investigated the diagnostic value of CSF for CMD in ANOCA patients.Results:A total of 103 ANOCA patients were enrolled in this study,with a mean age of(64.2±10.6)years,and 53.4％were female.Among them,57 patients(55.3％)were diagnosed with coronary slow flow.Patients with slow flow had higher IMR(P<0.001)and CFR(P=0.041).Similarly,the proportion of CMD with elevated IMR was higher in the slow flow group(P<0.001),while the proportion of CMD with reduced CFR was lower(P=0.044).There was no significant difference between the groups in the proportions of CMD with either reduced CFR or elevated IMR or CMD with both reduced CFR and elevated IMR(all P>0.05).CTFC was positively correlated with hyperemic mean transit time(r=0.424,P<0.001),IMR(r=0.430,P<0.001),and CFR(r=0.211,P=0.032).The area under the curve(AUC)of CTFC for diagnosing CMD with elevated IMR was 0.721(95％CI:0.623-0.819)with an accuracy of 67％(57％,76％),for diagnosing CMD with reduced CFR was 0.610(95％CI:0.499-0.720)with an accuracy of 60％(50％,70％),for diagnosing CMD with either reduced CFR or elevated IMR was 0.549(95％CI:0.425-0.673)with an accuracy of 47％(37％,57％),and for diagnosing CMD with both reduced CFR and elevated IMR was 0.582(95％CI:0.471-0.693)with an accuracy of 47％(37％,57％).Thus,CSF demonstrated limited diagnostic values across all subtypes of CMD.Conclusions:In ANOCA patients,CSF cannot serve as an effective diagnostic marker for CMD.Therefore,in clinical practice,the slow flow phenomenon should not be directly equated with the presence of coronary microvascular dysfunction in ANOCA patients.
