The application of enhanced recovery after surgery-multidisciplinary treatment modality in the surgical treatment of knee osteoarthritis in the elderly
10.3760/cma.j.cn115455-20240728-00651
- VernacularTitle:加速康复外科-多学科协作诊疗模式在高龄膝骨关节炎患者手术治疗中的应用
- Author:
Jianhua MA
1
;
Qinglei WANG
;
Lixiang DING
;
Shengliang FU
Author Information
1. 北京老年医院骨外科，北京 100095
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Osteoarthritis, knee;
Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty;
Enhanced recovery after surgery;
Multidisciplinary treatment;
Elderly patient
- From:
Chinese Journal of Postgraduates of Medicine
2025;48(7):615-621
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To evaluate the effect of enhance recovery after surgery-multidisciplinary treatment (ERAS-MDT) modality on elderly patients with knee osteoarthritis who underwent unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.Methods:This was a single-center, retrospective study: from August 2018 to September 2023, the data of 68 elderly patients (11 males and 57 females, aged from 75 to 91 years) who suffered from knee osteoarthritis came to Departmentof Orthopaedic Surgery, Beijing Geriatrics Hospital and underwent unicompartmental knee arthroplasty were collected and analyzed. The 36 patients who managed by ERAS-MDT modality were allocated to observational group, while the 32 patients who managed by the traditional treatment modality were allocated to the control group. The visual analogue score (VAS) was used to evaluate the pain extent, while the Oswestry disability index (ODI) was used for assessing the functional status. The efficiency was evaluated by the time interval between admission and surgery, time of the first off-bed ambulation training and hospital stays. The incidence rate of perioperative complications was collected. The modified MacNab criterion was used to assess the patient′s opinion of treatment satisfaction at the final follow-up.Results:The mean follow-up period was (8.3 ± 2.6) months. No significant differences were found pertaining to the demographic and baseline characteristics between the two groups ( P>0.05). All patients showed significantly improvement in leg pain and functional disability during the postoperative follow-up; the VAS and ODI scores in the observational group were significantly lower than that in the control group at the early postoperative follow-ups. The efficiency of diagnosis and treatment in the observational group were significantly higher than those in the control group, including the time interval between admission and surgery, time of the first off-bed ambulation training and the hospital stay: (2.8 ± 0.6) d vs. (3.7 ± 0.9) d, (0.9 ± 0.2) d vs. (2.1 ± 0.3) d and (14.8 ± 1.2) d vs. (17.7 ± 1.5) d, and there were statistical differences ( P<0.01). The incidence rate of perioperative complications in the observational group was significantly lower than that in the control group: 2.8% (1/36) vs. 18.8% (6/32), and there was statistical difference ( P<0.05). At the final follow-up, 94.4% (34/36) of patients in the observational group and 75.0% (24/32) of patients in the control group were satisfied with the treatment, the between-group difference was statistical significant ( P<0.05). Conclusions:Improved labor division and perioperative measurements can be implemented with the application of ERAS-MDT modality. Elderly patients who suffered from knee osteoarthritis would benefit from this improved treatment modality, achieving better treatment efficiency, enhanced recovery after surgery, as well as reduced incidence rate of perioperative complications.
