Construction of a clinical competence index system for general practitioners based on CIPP evaluation model
10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20240605-01976
- VernacularTitle:基于CIPP评价模式的全科医师临床能力指标体系的构建研究
- Author:
Shan CAI
1
;
Qi HAN
;
Lin LIU
;
Qipei GAO
;
Chaowei TIAN
Author Information
1. 广州医科大学附属第二医院毕业后教育中心，广州 510260
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
CIPP evaluation model;
General practitioner;
Clinical competence;
Index system
- From:
Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research
2025;24(3):315-319
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To explore the construction of clinical competence index system for general practitioners based on CIPP(context evaluation, input evaluation, process evaluation, product evaluation) evaluation model.Methods:Based on the CIPP evaluation model, a research team was established to conduct a literature review. Research articles were retrieved, screened, and analyzed to formulate the primary clinical competence index system for general practitioners based on CIPP evaluation model and the expert consultation questionnaire. The Delphi method was employed to finalize the clinical competence index system for general practitioners based on CIPP evaluation model.Results:A total of 24 experts from grade A tertiary hospitals in several provinces and cities in China participated in two rounds of consultation. The effective recovery rate for both rounds was 100.00%. The authority coefficients were 0.905 and 0.912, respectively. After the consultations, the coefficients of variation of indexes at all levels were <0.25. The Kendall's W of all indexes ranged between 0.769 and 0.814 in the first round and between 0.867 and 0.905 in the second round of expert consultation ( P<0.001). The final clinical competence index system for general practitioners based on CIPP evaluation model included 4 first-level indexes, 12 second-level indexes, and 42 third-level indicators. Conclusions:The clinical competence index system for general practitioners based on CIPP evaluation model established in this study has reference significance for further research on the training assessment and evaluation index system of clinical competence for general practitioners in China, and has important practical significance for the evaluation tool of clinical work performance of general practitioners.
