Comparison of healing effects of internal heat needle and electroacupuncture on post-stroke shoulder pain and their impacts on serum interleukin-6, interleukin-1β and tumor necrosis factor-α
10.3760/cma.j.cn115455-20250522-00453
- VernacularTitle:内热针与电针治疗脑卒中后肩痛的疗效对比及对血清白细胞介素-1β、白细胞介素-6、肿瘤坏死因子-α水平的影响
- Author:
Xiaoping ZHONG
1
;
Xile YANG
1
;
Saifei WU
1
;
Jing WU
1
;
Ronggang XU
1
Author Information
1. 杭州师范大学附属萧山医院康复科，杭州 311200
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Stroke;
Internal heat needle;
Electroacupuncture therapy;
Shoulder pain;
Inflammatory factors
- From:
Chinese Journal of Postgraduates of Medicine
2025;48(12):1063-1068
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To explore the healing effects of internal heat needle and electroacupuncture on post-stroke shoulder pain and their impacts on serum interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-1β (IL-1β), and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α).Methods:From January 2023 to March 2025, 94 patients with post-stroke shoulder pain admitted to the Affiliated Hospital of Hangzhou Normal University were included and separated into two groups according to a random number table. The 47 cases in the electroacupuncture group adopted electroacupuncture, while 47 cases in the internal heat needle group adopted internal heat needle. The pre- and post-treatment limb function, quality of life, healing effect, visual analogue scale (VAS), and serum IL-6, IL-1β, and TNF-α were compared.Results:After treatment, the Constant-Murley Shoulder Scale (CMS) score, shoulder range of motion (flexion, outward rotation, extension), Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) score, and Modified Barthel Index (MBI) in the internal heat acupuncture group were all better than those in the electroacupuncture group:(63.45 ± 10.31) points vs. (56.51 ± 9.15) points, (136.67 ± 32.44)° vs. (109.32 ± 25.01)°, (51.64 ± 12.84)° vs. (42.95 ± 11.72)°, (34.35 ± 10.15)° vs. (29.53 ± 9.82)°, (45.63 ± 10.25) points vs. (39.16 ± 10.43) points, (83.42 ± 16.09) points vs. (74.55 ± 15.83) points, there were statistical differences ( P<0.05). While the levels of serum IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, and VAS score in the internal heat needle group were decreased in the electroacupuncture group: (7.39 ± 3.68) ng/L vs. (9.28 ± 4.10) ng/L, (19.25 ± 2.12) ng/L vs. (28.50 ± 2.43) ng/L, (9.55 ± 3.54) ng/L vs. (11.17 ± 3.77) ng/L,(1.69 ± 0.45) points vs. (2.13 ± 0.56) points, there were statistical differences ( P<0.05). The therapeutic effect in the internal heat needle group was significantly higher than that in the electroacupuncture group:93.62% (44/47) vs. 78.72% (37/47), there was statistical difference ( P<0.05). Conclusions:For post-stroke shoulder pain, internal heat needle therapy has a clear healing effect than electroacupuncture, and can effectively reduce the levels of inflammatory factors such as IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α in serum.
