Optimized timing analysis for elective surgery after stent placement in malignant obstructive colorectal cancer
10.3969/j.issn.1009-9905.2025.09.007
- VernacularTitle:支架置入治疗后恶性梗阻性结直肠癌择期手术的时间优化分析
- Author:
Zong-bei LI
1
;
Hong-chao AN
1
;
Hua-zhi LI
1
Author Information
1. 清华大学附属垂杨柳医院 普外科(北京 100022)
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Malignant obstructive colorectal cancer;
Stent placement;
Elective surgery;
Time interval;
Survival analy-sis;
Prognostic factors
- From:
Chinese Journal of Current Advances in General Surgery
2025;28(9):707-714
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To explore the influence of different time intervals after stent implantation on the efficacy and prognosis of elective surgery in patients with malignant obstructive colorectal cancer(MOCRC).Methods:A total of 182 MOCRC patients were enrolled,including 92 who underwent emergency surgery(ES group)and 90 who received elective surgery after stent placement(SEMS group).The SEMS group was further divided into three subgroups based on the interval between stent placement and surgery:<11 d(n=27),11-17 d(n=39),and>17 d(n=24).Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare overall survival(OS)and disease-free survival(DFS),and Cox proportional hazards re-gression was employed to identify prognostic factors.Prognostic models based on surgical timing were constructed,and receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curves were drawn with area under the curve(AUC)calculated to assess model discrimination.A total of 182 patients with MOCRC were included.Among them,92 underwent emergency sur-gery(ES group),and 90 underwent elective surgery after stent implantation(SEMS group).The SEMS group was di-vided into the<11 d group(n=27),the 11-17 d group(n=39),and the>17 d group(n=24)according to the operation interval.Overall survival(OS)and disease-free survival(DFS)were compared using the Kaplan-Meier method,and prognostic factors were analyzed by Cox regression.Result:Compared with the ES group,the SEMS group had a higher rate of laparoscopic surgery and significantly less intraoperative blood loss(P<0.05),with no significant differ-ences in postoperative complication rate,stoma formation rate(P>0.05).Among SEMS patients,the 11～17 d group had the shortest hospital stay and the lowest complication rate(7.69%).Multivariate Cox analysis showed that surgery performed 11-17 d group significantly reduced the risk of death compared to emergency surgery(HR=0.650,P=0.034),while surgery 11 d group significantly increased the risk(HR=2.051,P=0.042).Independent predictors of OS in-cluded age(HR=1.060,P<0.001),preoperative CEA level(HR=1.323,P=0.002),tumor size(HR=1.421,P=0.028),tumor differentiation(HR=1.123,P=0.005),and venous invasion(HR=2.792,P<0.001).For DFS,age,tumor size,venous inva-sion,and perineural invasion were identified as independent risk factors(P<0.05),while surgical timing showed no sig-nificant association(P>0.05).Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed no significant difference in OS among different groups in stage Ⅰ-Ⅱ patients,whereas in stage Ⅲ patients,the 11-17 d group had better OS,and the>17 d group had signifi-cantly worse DFS than other groups(P=0.017).ROC curve analysis showed that the AUCs for OS prediction were 0.636(<11 d),0.601(11-17 d),and 0.750(>17 d);and for DFS prediction were 0.655,0.567,and 0.874,respectively,indicating that surgical timing has moderate discriminative value for survival outcomes.Conclusion:Elective surgery performed 11 to 17 d after stent placement can reduce mortality and improve postoperative recovery,although it has no significant impact on recurrence risk.Venous and peripheral nerve invasion are major factors affecting disease-free survival(DFS);therefore,clinical management should focus on identifying high-risk patients and optimizing individual-ized treatment strategies.
