Effect of ligation combined with peroral endoscopic cardial constriction on symptom improvement in patients with refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease
10.3760/cma.j.cn115455-20230713-00756
- VernacularTitle:套扎联合经口内镜下贲门缩窄术对难治性胃食管反流病患者症状改善的影响研究
- Author:
Tangzhou XU
1
;
Bingfeng QIU
1
;
Qi XU
1
;
Jibo MAO
1
;
Junhan QU
1
Author Information
1. 浙江省舟山医院消化内科，舟山 316004
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Gastroesophageal reflux;
Endoscopic cardioconstriction;
Signs and symptoms, digestive;
Treatment outcome
- From:
Chinese Journal of Postgraduates of Medicine
2025;48(2):116-120
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the effect of ligation combined with peroral endoscopic cardial constriction (PECC) on the improvement of symptoms in patients with refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease(GERD).Methods:The clinical data of 42 patients with refractory GERD admitted to Zhejiang Zhoushan Hospital from March 2019 to March 2023 were collected retrospectively. Among them, 21 patients were treated with conventional drugs (control group), and 21 patients were treated with ligation combined with PECC on the basis of the control group(study group). The frequency and time of reflux, symptom score, frequency of reflux occurrence, and clinical efficacy of the two groups were compared before and after treatment.Results:After treatment, the longest regurgitation time, acid regurgitation time, total regurgitation times, acid regurgitation times, non-acid regurgitation times and weak acid regurgitation times in the study group were lower than those in the control group: (2.14 ± 0.12)min vs. (4.23 ± 1.03) min, (49.22 ± 5.13) min vs. (60.15 ± 6.21) min, (25.13 ± 2.11) times vs. (30.53 ± 3.52) times, (8.11 ± 0.63) times vs. (9.84 ± 0.85) times, (6.11 ± 0.51) times vs. (8.01 ± 0.72) times, (10.11 ± 1.12) times vs. (23.14 ± 1.29) times, there were statistical differences ( P<0.05). After treatment, the scores of GERD Health Quality of Life Scale (GERD-HRQL), Reflux Disease Questionnaire (RDQ) and Reflux Symptom Index Scale (RSI) in the study group were lower than those in the control group: (5.19 ± 0.42) scores vs. (11.34 ± 1.35) scores, (4.15 ± 0.34) scores vs. (10.66 ± 1.63) scores, (3.27 ± 0.24) scores vs.(7.51 ± 0.56) scores, there were statistical differences ( P<0.05). After treatment, the frequency of liquid-gas reflux, liquid reflux and gas reflux in the study group after treatment were lower than those in the control group: (10.14 ± 1.15) times/24 h vs. (14.39 ± 1.33) times/24 h, (5.12 ± 0.42) times/24 h vs. (6.06 ± 0.74) times/24 h, (7.62 ± 0.72) times/24 h vs. (10.43 ± 1.34) times/24 h, there were statistical differences ( P<0.05). The total effective rate in the study group was higher than that in the control group: 90.48%(19/21) vs. 57.14%(12/21), there was a statistical difference ( χ2 = 5.02, P<0.05). Conclusions:Ligation combined with PECC in patients with GERD has an ideal effect, which can effectively improve the frequency and symptom score of patients with reflux, reduce the frequency and time of reflux, and improve clinical efficacy.
