Comparative study on the visual quality of different types of multifocal in-traocular lenses after cataract surgery
10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2025.0166
- VernacularTitle:白内障术后不同类型多焦点人工晶状体视觉质量的对比研究
- Author:
Jiaping DENG
1
;
Sen LIU
;
Han JIANG
;
Meng MA
;
Chengzhang LUO
;
Jun ZHENG
;
Shuangle LI
Author Information
1. 643000 四川省自贡市,自贡市第一人民医院眼科
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
cataract;
multifocal intraocular lens;
visual quality;
higher-order aberrations
- From:
Recent Advances in Ophthalmology
2025;45(12):967-973
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare and analyze the impact of intraocular higher-order aberrations and total ocular higher-order aberrations on visual quality after the implantation of different types of multifocal intraocular lenses(MIOL),in order to provide personalized MIOL selection recommendations for patients.Methods A total of 107 patients(107 eyes)with age-related cataract were selected and divided into the SBL-3,MF15,ZMB00,and Zeiss809 groups based on the type of MIOL implanted.Uncorrected distance visual acuity(UCDVA),best-corrected distance visual acuity(BCDVA),best-corrected near visual acuity(BCNVA),optical parameters and wavefront aberrations were compared 3 months postop-eratively.Results Preoperatively,there were no statistically significant differences in any optical parameters or visual acuity among the four groups(all P＞0.05).At three months postoperatively,there were no significant differences in UCD-VA,BCDVA,BCNVA,corneal aberration,or intraocular spherical aberration among the four groups(all P＞0.05).How-ever,significant differences were observed in the predicted visual acuity at 100％,20％,and 9％contrast(100％VA,20％VA,9％VA),streller ratio(SR),modulation transfer function cutoff frequency(MTF cutoff),intraocular coma,intraocu-lar trefoil,total higher-order aberrations,and the average modulation transfer function height values(MTF AH)of the en-tire eye across various spatial frequencies showed significant differences(all P＜0.05).Pairwise comparisons showed that the ZMB00 and Zeiss809 groups had significantly better 100％VA,20％VA,9％VA,SR,MTF cutoff,and MTF AH,and sig-nificantly lower intraocular coma,intraocular trefoil,and total higher-order aberrations than the SBL-3 group(all P＜0.05).The MF15 group only had significantly lower intraocular trefoil than the SBL-3 group(P＜0.05).Correlation analy-sis results at 3 months postoperatively showed that in the SBL-3 and MF15 groups,UCDVA(logMAR)was positively corre-lated with the objective scattering index and negatively correlated with 100％VA,20％VA,9％VA,SR,and MTF cutoff(all P＜0.05).MTF AH was negatively correlated with intraocular coma and total higher-order aberrations,and positively cor-related with intraocular spherical aberration(all P＜0.05).In the ZMB00 and Zeiss809 groups,MTF AH was negatively cor-related with intraocular coma,intraocular trefoil,and total higher-order aberrations(all P＜0.05),but showed no correla-tion with intraocular spherical aberration(all P＞0.05).Conclusion There are no differences in UCDVA,BCDVA,or BCNVA among patients implanted with the four types of MIOLs,but differences existed in objective visual quality.The ob-jective visual quality of ZMB00 and Zeiss809 is significantly better than that of SBL-3,making them the preferred choices for patients with high-quality visual demands;SBL-3 is suitable for basic demand scenarios;MF15,which is only superior to SBL-3 in terms of intraocular trefoil,can be a compromise option for those sensitive to trefoil aberration.
