Application of iterative model reconstruction technique in low-dose lumbar CT scanning
10.3969/j.issn.1002-1671.2025.02.033
- VernacularTitle:迭代模型重建技术在腰椎低剂量CT扫描中的应用
- Author:
Weicong ZHU
1
;
Huiyun ZENG
1
;
Chen DU
1
;
Yating WU
1
;
Bin WANG
1
Author Information
1. 东莞康华医院放射科,广东 东莞 523000
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
iterative model reconstruction;
computed tomography;
radiation dose;
lumbar vertebra
- From:
Journal of Practical Radiology
2025;41(2):323-327
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To explore the application value of iterative model reconstruction(IMR)technique in low-dose lumbar CT scanning.Methods A total of 48 patients who underwent lumbar CT plain scan were selected and divided into regular-dose group(group A)and ultra-low dose group(group B).The group A underwent imaging with 120 kV tube voltage,automatic tube current modulation technology,and iDose 4 reconstruction.The group B was scanned with a tube voltage of 100 kV and a tube current of 80 mAs,and the images of B1 and B2 groups were reconstructed by iDose 4 and IMR,respectively.The standard deviation(SD)value(the SD value represents the noise of the measured tissue),signal-to-noise ratio(SNR),and contrast-to-noise ratio(CNR)of cancellous bone,intervertebral disc,dural sac,and psoas muscle were measured and calculated at the L3-L4 vertebral body level.Two diagnosticians rated the image quality.Sample t-test and ANOVA were used to compare the measurement results and subjective scores.Results The comparison of SD for intervertebral disc,dural sac,and psoas muscle showed group B2＜group A＜group B1,while the subjective score comparison indicated group A＞group B2＞group B1.The SNR for intervertebral disc and psoas muscle demonstrated group B2＞group A＞group B1.There was no significant difference in bone quality score between group A and group B1(P＞0.05),but there was a significantly different between the bone quality scores of group B2 and those obtained with iDose 4 reconstruction(group A and group B1)(P＜0.05).The effective dose(ED)of group B was reduced by approximately 70.28％compared with group A.Conclusion IMR can significantly reduce SD,improves SNR and CNR,resulting in high-quality images.Compared to iDose 4 technique,IMR has more advantages in soft tissue display,while iDose 4 technique is superior in observing fine bone structures.The combined application of iDose 4 and IMR technique ensures high-quality images for diagnosis,while significantly reducing the radiation dose to patients.
