Clinical observation on the efficacy and safety of intravenous thrombolysis in the treatment of acute mild non-disabling ischemic stroke:a single-center retrospective observational study
10.3969/j.issn.1006-7795.2025.01.009
- VernacularTitle:静脉溶栓治疗急性轻型非致残性缺血性脑卒中有效性和安全性的临床观察:一项单中心回顾性观察研究
- Author:
Meng ZHANG
1
;
Yongxin MA
;
Qiong JIA
;
Dongwei ZHANG
;
Xinhong ZHANG
;
Yaoming XU
Author Information
1. 内蒙古民族大学附属医院神经内科,内蒙古通辽 028000
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
intravenous thrombolysis;
dual antiplatelet therapy;
acute mild non-disabling ischemic stroke;
prognosis
- From:
Journal of Capital Medical University
2025;46(1):56-62
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To explore the clinical efficacy and safety of intravenous thrombolysis and dual antiplatelet therapy in the treatment of acute mild non-disabling ischemic stroke.Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted,including 138 patients with acute mild non-disabling ischemic stroke[National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale(NIHSS)score≤5]from January 2022 to March 2024,within 6 h of onset.Patients were divided into an intravenous thrombolysis group(66 cases)and a dual antiplatelet group(72 cases).Propensity score matching was used to match patients 1∶1,resulting in 44 patients in each group after matching.Demographic data,clinical data,clinical outcome indicators,and adverse events were collected.The primary outcome was defined as a good functional outcome[modified Rankin Scale(mRS)score 0-2]at 90 d post-onset.Secondary outcomes included NIHSS scores at 24 h,72 h,and 7 d post-onset;the proportion of early neurological deterioration;intracranial and systemic hemorrhagic events within 90 d post-onset;and death within 90 d.Results ①Before matching,the intravenous thrombolysis group had a lower age and admission mRS score than that of the dual antiplatelet group,with statistically significant differences(all P＜0.05).After matching,there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of age,gender,hypertension,diabetes,cardiac disease,atrial fibrillation,hyper low density lipoprotein-cholesterol(LDL-C),hyperhomocysteinemia,prior stroke,prior smoking,admission NIHSS score,admission mRS score,location of stroke and TOAST classification(all P＞0.05);②There was no statistically significant difference in the proportion of patients with a good functional outcome at 90 d post-onset and the mRS score at 90 d between the intravenous thrombolysis group and the dual antiplatelet group[88.6％(39/44)vs 93.2％(41/44),P=0.458,P=0.308];③ The intravenous thrombolysis group had significantly lower median NIHSS scores at 24 h and 72 h post-onset compared to the dual antiplatelet group,with statistically significant differences[1 vs 2.5,1 vs 2,P=0.018,0.043].There were no statistically significant differences in the other efficacy and safety outcomes.Conclusions Intravenous thrombolysis therapy can bring significant short-term benefits to patients with acute mild non-disabling ischemic stroke,helping to shorten the time to recovery to a good neurological functional outcome,and does not increase the risk of bleeding and mortality.However,in terms of good functional outcomes at 90 d post-onset,its effects are similar to those of dual antiplatelet therapy.Nevertheless,there is an urgent need for larger sample,higher quality clinical studies to further validate these findings.
