Relationship between the degree of paravertebral muscle fat infiltration, trabecular bone score and fracture risk in postmenopausal osteoporosis patients
10.3760/cma.j.cn115807-20250604-00154
- VernacularTitle:椎旁肌脂肪浸润程度、骨小梁评分的影像分析与绝经后骨质疏松患者骨折风险的关系研究
- Author:
Guowei WANG
1
;
Jingjing LIU
;
Jiang WANG
;
Changchun LIU
Author Information
1. 浙江中医药大学附属江南医院放射科，杭州 311201
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Degree of paravertebral muscle fat infiltration;
Bone trabecular score;
Bone density;
Menopause;
Osteoporosis
- From:
Chinese Journal of Endocrine Surgery
2025;19(5):725-731
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:Through imaging analysis, the association between the degree of paravertebral muscle fat infiltration (fat infiltration, FI), trabecular bone score (TBS) and the fracture risk of postmenopausal osteoporosis (OP) patients was explored.Methods:A retrospective selection was made of 110 postmenopausal female patients diagnosed with OP at Jiangnan Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang Chinese Medical University from Mar. 2023 to Mar. 2024. Additionally, healthy postmenopausal individuals who underwent physical examinations during the same period were included in the healthy postmenopausal group. The levels of paravertebral muscle FI and TBS in the two groups were compared. Postmenopausal patients with OP were followed up for one year, and the incidence of fractures in the patients was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier curve. The patients were divided into the fracture group ( n=29) and the non-fracture group ( n=81). The clinical data of the two groups of patients at admission were compared. Binary Logistic regression was used to analyze the independent risk factors for fractures in patients. Spearman was used to analyze the correlation of fracture risk within one year among FI, TBS and postmenopausal OP patients. ROC was used to evaluate the predictive value of each independent risk factor. Results:The proportion of severe paraverteal muscle FI in the postmenopausal OP group was significantly higher than that in the healthy physical examination group (multifisis FI, erector spinae FI, psoas major muscle FI, χ2=14.96, 17.17, 16.08, all P=0.00), and the lumbar TBS level was significantly lower (t=4.52, P=0.00). The Kaplan-Meier curve indicated that the degree of paravertebral muscle FI affected the incidence of fractures in patients ( χ2=14.58, P=0.00), and the level of lumbar TBS also affected the incidence of fractures in patients ( χ2=6.02, P=0.01). The bone mineral density (BMD), cross-sectional area of the multifidus muscle (CSA), erectus spinae muscle area (CSA), and psoas major muscle area (CSA) of patients in the fracture group were significantly lower than those in the non-fracture group ( t=10.72, 3.40, 3.46, 2.12). P=0.00, 0.00, 0.00, 0.04), while the indicators of TNF-α, IL-6 and PCT were higher than those in the non-fracture group ( t=4.11, 4.96, 5.48, all P=0.00). Binary Logistic regression analysis showed that high-level BMD ( OR=0.52, 95%CI: 0.27-0.77, P=0.01) and TBS ( OR=0.68, 95 %CI: 0.48-0.93 ,P=0.02) were protective factors for fractures in postmenopausal patients with OP. Multifidus FI ( OR=1.73, 95 %CI: 1.48-1.98, P=0.03), erector spinae FI ( OR=1.25, 95%CI:1.10-1.50, P=0.01), and psoas major FI ( OR=1.96, 95 %CI: 1.71-2.21, P=0.03) is the risk factor. Spearman analysis indicated that the paravertebral muscle FI of patients at the first diagnosis of OP was positively correlated with the risk of fracture within one year after diagnosis ( r=0.88, 0.91, 0.82, P=0.01, 0.01, 0.02), while the BMD and TBS values were negatively correlated ( r=-0.92, -0.77, P=0.00, 0.02). ROC showed that the values of multifidus FI, erector spinae FI, psoas major FI, BMD and TBS at admission all had good predictive efficacy for fractures within one year in patients [area under the ROC curve (AUC) =0.88, 0.84, 0.86, 0.73, 0.82]. Moreover, the predictive efficiency of the joint model is higher (AUC=0.89) . Conclusions:Higher BMD and TBS levels protect against fractures in postmenopausal OP patients ( OR=0.523-0.675), while severe paraspinal muscle FI (multifidus: OR=1.726; erector spinae: OR=1.248; psoas: OR=1.961) increases risk. The combined model shows excellent predictive value (AUC=0.890), serving as effective clinical warning indicators for fracture risk assessment.
