Effects of upper limb rehabilitation robot training combined with intermittent theta burst stimulation on upper limb motor and neurological function in stroke patients with hemiplegia
10.3969/j.issn.1672-5921.2025.11.004
- VernacularTitle:上肢康复机器人训练联合间歇性θ短阵快速脉冲刺激对卒中偏瘫患者上肢运动功能及神经功能的影响
- Author:
Ling ZHANG
1
;
Changsheng LIN
;
Min BAI
;
Qiang LIN
;
Teng MA
;
Ran TIAN
;
Yan ZHOU
;
Xian LI
;
Xueping LI
Author Information
1. 210006 南京医科大学附属南京医院(南京市第一医院)康复医学科
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Stroke;
Upper limb rehabilitation robot;
Intermittent theta burst stimulation;
Motor function
- From:
Chinese Journal of Cerebrovascular Diseases
2025;22(11):763-771
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the therapeutic effects of upper limb rehabilitation robot training combined with intermittent theta burst stimulation(iTBS)on upper limb motor and neurological function in stroke patients with hemiplegia.Methods This study retrospectively consecutive enrolled 46 stroke hemiparetic patients from the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine,Nanjing Pukou People's Hospital.The patients were randomly assigned to a control group and an experimental group(23patients in each)using a random number table.Baseline data,including sex,age,disease duration,side of hemiplegia,and stroke type,were collected from patients enrolled.All patients received conventional treatment.The control group received upper limb rehabilitation robot training combined with iTBS sham stimulation(coil placed perpendicular to the skull),while the experimental group received upper limb rehabilitation robot training combined with iTBS real stimulation(coil placed parallel to the skull).Both groups underwent treatment for 3 weeks.Upper limb motor function was assessed using the Fugl-Meyer upper extremity(FMA-UE)scale and Wolf motor function test(WMFT);while neurological function was evaluated using the motor-evoked potentials(MEP)latency,amplitude,and central motor conduction time(CMCT)of the affected thumb abductor muscle.Activities of daily living were assessed using the modified Barthel index(MBI).Results(1)No significant differences in baseline data were found between the two groups(all P＞0.05).(2)Before treatment,the FMA-UE and WMFT scores in the experimental group were 27.48±7.87 and 28.22±3.87,respectively;and in the control group were 26.35±4.78 and 28.35±3.33,respectively;there were no significant differences in both FMA-UE and WMFT scores between the two groups(all P＞0.05).After 3weeks of treatment,the FMA-UE and WMFT scores in the experimental group were 40.35±8.96 and 37.74±4.11,respectively;and in the control group were 32.78±4.50 and 32.57±4.11,respectively;there were significant interaction effects of time and group(Ftime×group values of 19.613 and 31.522,both P＜0.01),main effects of group(Fgroup values of 5.401 and 5.897,both P＜0.05),and main effects of time(Ftime values of 176.516 and 211.478,both P＜0.01).(3)Before treatment,the MEP latency,amplitude,and CMCT in the experimental group were(24.39±3.56)ms,(137.77±42.67)μV,and(10.62±2.76)ms,respectively;and in the control group were(24.64±2.77)ms,(136.74±48.77)μV,and(10.73±1.84)ms,respectively,there were no significant differences between the two groups(all P＞0.05).After 3weeks of treatment,the MEP latency,amplitude,and CMCT in the experimental group were(20.39±1.83)ms,(239.91±43.70)μV,and(6.58±1.23)ms,respectively,and in the control group were(22.53±3.53)ms,(198.54±50.37)μV,and(9.19±1.60)ms,respectively,there were significant interaction effects of time and group(Ftime×group values of 7.270,15.554,and 20.110,all P＜0.05)and main effects of time(Ftime values of 76.540,256.706,and 100.629,all P＜0.01),the main effect of group for CMCT was significant(Fgroup=7.406,P＜0.01),but there were no significant difference in the main effect of group on MEP latency,amplitude between two groups(Fgroup values of 2.145,2.778,both P＞0.05).(4)Before treatment,the MBI score in the experimental group was 42.83±7.36,and in the control group was 43.91±6.56,with no significant difference between two groups(P＞0.05).After 3 weeks of treatments,the MBI score in the experimental group was 67.83±12.69,and in the control group was 54.13±5.57,there were significant interaction effects of time and group(Ftime×group=39.862,P＜0.01),main effects of group(Fgroup=8.083,P=0.007),and main effects of time(Ftime=226.241,P＜0.01).Conclusions Upper limb rehabilitation robot training combined with iTBS can improve upper limb motor function and neurological function and enhance the daily living activity ability of stroke patients.Real iTBS combined with robot training has a more significant effect than sham iTBS.
