Risk factors for interpectoral lymph node metastasis in breast cancer and its impact on prognosis
10.3760/cma.j.cn115807-20240807-00261
- VernacularTitle:乳腺癌胸肌间淋巴结转移的危险因素及其对预后的影响
- Author:
Yongwei LU
1
;
Guangfu HU
;
Qian ZHAO
;
Cheng WANG
Author Information
1. 上海市第二人民医院乳腺外科，上海 200011
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Breast cancer;
Interpectoral lymph nodes;
Metastasis
- From:
Chinese Journal of Endocrine Surgery
2025;19(2):147-152
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the association of interpectoral lymph nodes (IPNs) with clinicopathological characteristics in breast cancer and to evaluate their prognostic significance.Method:Data from 117 primary breast cancer specimens with complete clinical and follow-up information who underwent IPNs clearance from Feb. 2016 to Jun. 2024 in Shanghai Second People’s Hospital were collected, including patient age, tumor location, pathological type, histological grade, TNM stage, lymphovascular invasion (LVI) , molecular typing, Ki67, detection rate of IPNs, metastasis rate of IPNs, and patient follow-up information. SPSS18.0 was used to analyze the risk factors and impact on prognosis of IPNs metastasis. In addition, the data of 117 patients with primary breast cancer who did not undergo IPNs in the same period were collected and compared with those who underwent IPNs.Results:In 117 primary breast cancer specimens, the detection rate of IPNs was 28.2% (33/117) , and the metastasis rate was 4.3% (5/117) . There was no statistical difference in patient age ( χ2=0.59, P=1.000) , tumor location ( χ2=2.13, P=0.813) , pathological type ( χ2=1.86, P=0.500) , histological grade ( χ2=0.47, P=0.643) , T stage ( χ2=4.18, P=0.247) , N stage ( χ2=4.89, P=0.127) , TNM stage ( χ2=2.23, P=0.336) , LVI ( χ2=1.05, P=0.360) , molecular typing ( χ2=1.17, P=0.901) , or Ki67 ( χ2=0.01, P=1.000) between IPNs metastasis group and no IPNs metastasis group. However, the data showed that patients with advanced TNM stage and axillary lymph node metastasis were more likely to develop IPNs metastasis. During a median follow-up period of 29 months, IPNs metastasis had no significant effect on the invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) or overall survival (OS) of patients. Meanwhile, there was no significant difference in iDFs or OS between the IPNs non cleaning group and the IPNs cleaning group. Conclusions:The metastasis rate of IPNs in breast cancer patients is not high, mainly occurring in patients with advanced TNM staging and axillary lymph node metastasis. The metastasis of IPNs has no significant impact on the short-term recurrence survival of patients. Moreover, whether IPNs cleaning or not has no significant impact on the recurrence or survival of for the general patients with breast cancer. However, its value in predicting prognosis needs to be verified through larger samples and longer follow-up periods.
