Cumulative live birth rate per oocyte retrieval cycle in patients aged 20-50 years using PPOS versus GnRH antagonist protocol: a propensity score matching study
10.3760/cma.j.cn101441-20220511-00204
- VernacularTitle:应用PPOS与拮抗剂方案的20~50岁患者每取卵周期累积活产率比较：一项倾向性评分匹配研究
- Author:
Hong CHEN
1
;
Zhiqin CHEN
;
Zili SUN
;
Guohua LI
;
Jinxia ZHENG
;
Yuanyuan WU
;
Di YAO
;
Kunming LI
;
Miaoxin CHEN
;
Xiaoming TENG
Author Information
1. 同济大学附属上海市第一妇婴保健院生殖医学科，上海 201204
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Fertilization in vitro;
Embryo transfer;
Progestin primed ovarian stimulation protocol;
Antagonist protocol;
Cumulative live birth rate
- From:
Chinese Journal of Reproduction and Contraception
2023;43(5):473-482
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) per oocyte retrieval cycle between gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol and progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol in patients aged 20-50 years.Methods:A retrospective cohort study was conducted to analyze 3 752 infertile patients aged 20-50 years who received in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection and embryo transfer (IVF/ICSI-ET). They used either GnRH antagonist protocol or PPOS protocol at the Center of Assisted Reproduction in Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital from January 2017 to April 2021. One to one propensity score matching (PSM) was used to match the population characteristics. Baseline, clinical and laboratory characteristics, as well as pregnancy outcomes were compared between the two groups. The differences of CLBR was analyzed by multivariate logistic regression and subgroup analysis. Results:After matching, 1 466 patients (733 in each group) were included in the analysis. No significant differences were detected in age, body mass index, infertility type, cause and duration of infertility, number of stimulation cycles, basal follicle-stimulating hormone, number of antral follicles and composition ratio of insemination methods between the two groups ( P>0.05). Serum estradiol level [1 700.30 (1 011.76, 2 580.50) ng/L] and luteinizing hormone (LH) level [1.95 (1.07, 5.27) U/L] on trigger day were significantly lower in GnRH antagonist group than in PPOS group [2 056.50 (884.08, 3 601.59) ng/L, P=0.010; 3.00 (1.51, 5.00) U/L, P<0.001]. The cycle cancellation rate of PPOS group [30.56% (224/733)] was significantly higher than that of GnRH antagonist group [18.83% (138/733), P<0.001]. The numbers of oocytes obtained, available embryos and good-quality embryos were similar to those in GnRH antagonist group (all P>0.05). For each embryo transfer cycle, the implantation rate [16.97% (207/1 220) vs. 21.42% (266/1 242)], the clinical pregnancy rate [21.78% (188/863) vs. 27.38% (233/851)], the onging pregnancy rate [16.11% (139/863) vs. 21.62% (184/851)] and the live birth rate [15.06% (130/863) vs. 20.80% (177/851)] were significantly lower in PPOS group than in GnRH antagonist group ( P=0.010, P=0.012, P=0.004 and P=0.002, respectively). The CLBR of PPOS group was significantly lower than that of GnRH antagonist group [17.74% (130/733) vs. 24.15% (177/733), P=0.003]. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that ovarian stimulation protocol was an independent risk factor for CLBR [ OR=1.42, 95% CI: 1.03-1.95, P=0.032]. The results of subgroup analysis showed that the CLBR of PPOS group was significantly lower than that of GnRH antagonist group in the population aged ≤35 years and underwent non-first IVF/ICSI cycle [21.35% (111/520) vs. 28.93% (151/522), P=0.005; 7.85% (41/522) vs. 12.23% (62/507), P=0.019]. Conclusion:Compared with PPOS regimen, antagonist regimen can improve the CLBR per oocyte cycle in infertile patients aged 20-50 years, and is more significant in women aged ≤35 years and non-first oocyte collection patients.
