Safety and accuracy of robotic-assisted screw placement in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
10.3760/cma.j.cn115455-20240110-00049
- VernacularTitle:机器人辅助置钉治疗青少年特发性脊柱侧凸的安全性和准确性研究
- Author:
Xinuo ZHANG
1
;
Qingjun SU
1
;
Dongyue LI
1
;
Luming TAO
1
;
Yong HAI
1
Author Information
1. 首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院骨科，北京 100020
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Robotic surgical procedures;
Scoliosis;
Adolescent;
Radiation exposure
- From:
Chinese Journal of Postgraduates of Medicine
2025;48(1):17-23
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the safety and accuracy between robotic-assisted screw placement and free-hand screw placement in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) surgery.Methods:The clinical data of 69 AIS patients underwent posterior spinal scoliosis orthomorphia from December 2021 to October 2023 in Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 37 patients underwent robot-assisted screw placement (robot group), and 32 patients underwent fluoroscopy-assisted free-hand screw placement (free-hand group). The basic information of surgery (operation time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative radiation exposure time, postoperative hospital stay and postoperative complications), screw placement indexes (single screw placement time and accuracy of screw placement) and imaging indexes (main curve correction rate, kyphotic change and lumbar lordosis change) were compared between two groups. The ln curve regression analysis method was used to evaluate the learning curve of robot-assisted screw placement therapy for AIS.Results:A total of 716 screws were placed in 32 patients of free-hand group, and 766 screws in 37 patients of robot group. The operation time, intraoperative radiation exposure time, single screw placement time and accuracy of screw placement in robot group were significantly higher than those in free-hand group: (272.30 ± 67.98) min vs. (221.66 ± 67.32) min, (149.81 ± 57.21) s vs. (116.03 ± 63.10) s, (497.97 ± 51.74) s vs. (381.47 ± 46.58) s and 97.91% (750/766) vs. 91.48% (655/716), and there were statistical differences ( P<0.01 or <0.05); there were no statistical differences in intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, incidence of neurological complications, incidence of incision infection and number of screw between two groups ( P>0.05). There were no statistical differences in the main curve correction rate, kyphotic change and lumbar lordosis change between two groups ( P>0.05). When the fitting degree was the highest ( R2 = 0.729, P<0.01), the fitting equation was y = - 50.93ln x + 634.7 ( x was the number of operation, and y was the single screw placement time), and the number of vertices was 12 cases. The robot group was divided into three subgroups according to the order of surgery, subgroup A consisted of 12 patients who underwent the surgery from first to twelfth, subgroup B consisted of 12 patients who underwent the surgery from thirteenth to twenty-fourth, and subgroup C consisted of 13 patients who underwent the surgery from twenty-fifth to thirty-seventh. Among them, the single screw placement time in subgroup A was significantly longer than that in subgroup B and subgroup C: (560.92 ± 35.03) s vs. (465.75 ± 21.20) and (469.62 ± 24.94) s, and there was statistical difference ( P<0.05); there was no statistical difference between subgroup B and subgroup C ( P>0.05). Conclusions:Robot-assisted screw placement for AIS can effectively improve the accuracy of screw placement without affecting deformity correction, but it can increase screw placement time, operation time and radiation exposure time. A smooth learning curve is obtained after performing 12 procedures.
