A survey on the current knowledge of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth among Chinese gastroenterology clinicians
10.3760/cma.j.cn311367-20250428-00177
- VernacularTitle:中国消化专科临床医师对小肠细菌过度生长认知现况的调研
- Author:
Mengyu ZHANG
1
;
Fangfei CHEN
1
;
Niandi TAN
1
;
Yinglian XIAO
1
Author Information
1. 中山大学附属第一医院消化内科，广州 510080
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Functional gastrointestinal disorder;
Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth;
Hydrogen and methane breath test;
Diagnostic standards;
Knowledge survey;
Expe
- From:
Chinese Journal of Digestion
2025;45(8):541-547
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the current level of awareness among Chinese gastroenterologists regarding small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO).Methods:From March 7th to April 14th, 2024, an online survey questionnaire was sent to qualified clinical physicians specializing in gastroenterology in various levels of general hospitals across the country through the official channels of national academic organizations such as the Gastroenterology Branch of the Chinese Medical Association, the Gastrointestinal Motility Group of the Gastroenterology Branch of the Chinese Medical Association, and the Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders Collaborative Group of the Gastroenterology Branch of the Chinese Medical Association, as well as through the national medical continuing education project cooperation platform. The questionnaire content includes basic information, awareness of consensus guidelines on functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGID) and SIBO, understanding of SIBO and its diagnosis and treatment strategies, et al. The influencing factors of physicians′ cognitive level regarding SIBO were analyzed based on the questionnaire results. Statistical methods employed descriptive statistical method and partial correlation analysis.Results:A total of 511 valid questionnaires were collected, among them, 78.1% (399/511) of the respondents practiced in tertiary hospitals, and 90.2% (461/511) of the respondents were aware of the definition of SIBO. However, only 9.0% (46/511) could accurately identify all the key points of the relevant consensus guidelines. Educational background (undergraduate and master′s degree vs. doctor degree, OR=0.265, 0.528, 95% confidence interval(95% CI): 0.155 to 0.454, 0.322 to 0.865), professional title (junior title vs. senior title, OR=0.577, 95% CI: 0.344 to 0.968), and the number of SIBO cases handled per year (less than 50 cases vs. more than 200 cases, OR=0.144, 95% CI: 0.043 to 0.479) were independent influencing factors that affect the cognitive level of specialist physicians regarding SIBO and the guidelines (all P<0.05). The results of hydrogen and methane breath test (HMBT) was the main reference indicator for diagnosing SIBO in the respondents (79.8%, 408/511), but only 8.4%(43/511) of the specialists were familiar with the principle of HMBT, and 65.9% (337/511) were not clear about the differences in diagnostic thresholds among different consensus or guidelines. Rifaximin was the most commonly used therapy (87.5%, 447/511), but there was significant heterogeneity in the selection of dosage and treatment course. According to the survey, 17.6% (90/511) of the clinicians believed that comprehensive assessment of the patient′s clinical condition was not necessary for the diagnosis and treatment of FGID. Conclusion:Gastroenterologists are familiar with the basic concepts of SIBO, but their understanding of the diagnostic criteria application and the latest research progress is limited.
