Evaluation of Chinese and English Reports Quality of Randomized Controlled Trial of Acupuncture in the Treatment of Smoking Cessation Based on CONSORT Statment and STRICTA Checklist
10.11842/wst.20240603003
- VernacularTitle:基于CONSORT声明和STRICTA清单评价中英文针灸戒烟随机对照试验报告质量
- Author:
Hongyang LI
1
;
Ningzi ZANG
;
Xiaodong LYU
;
Lijian PANG
;
Hao YIN
;
Mengman GAO
Author Information
1. 辽宁中医药大学 沈阳 110847
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Smoking cessation;
Acupuncture;
Randomized controlled trial;
CONSORT statement evaluation;
STRICTA checklist evaluation
- From:
World Science and Technology-Modernization of Traditional Chinese Medicine
2025;27(6):1628-1641
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To evaluate the reporting quality of randomized controlled trials on acupuncture cessation by using CONSORT statement and STRICTA checklist.Methods According to inclusion and exclusion criteria,9 Chinese and English databases such as CNKI and PubMed were searched by computer,and the retrieved literatures were evaluated according to the CONSORT statement 2010 and STRICTA checklist 2010.Results After exclusion,34 Chinese and English literatures were included,including 27 in Chinese and 7 in English.In a risk review using ROB2,the Cochrane Collaboration's bias risk assessment tool,29 reviews were judged to be high risk overall,2 to be at some risk,and 3 to be at low risk.In the CONSORT statement evaluation,the reporting rate of 23 items was less than 76.4%,including the reporting rate of 17 items was less than 47%.In the STRICTA checklist evaluation,the reporting rate of 9 items was less than 76.4%,including the reporting rate of 4 items was less than 29.4%.Conclusion There are still shortcomings in the methodological design and item reporting standards of acupuncture smoking cessation RCT.It is suggested that researchers should strictly follow the CONSORT declaration and STRICTA list in designing RCT schemes and reporting RCT results in the future.
