Study of the dose advantage of 3D printed applicator in postoperative brachytherapy for endometrial cancer
10.3760/cma.j.cn113030-20250409-00140
- VernacularTitle:子宫内膜癌术后放疗3D打印导板剂量优势研究
- Author:
Yunfeng GUO
1
;
Xiaoliang LIANG
1
;
Siyang LIU
1
;
Yuan CAO
1
;
Wei GAO
1
;
Xiaomei FAN
1
Author Information
1. 河北医科大学第四医院妇瘤科，石家庄 050011
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Endometrial neoplasms;
Printing, three-dimensional;
Brachytherapy
- From:
Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology
2025;34(10):1008-1013
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the dosimetric differences between a 3D-printed non-coplanar multi-channel applicator and traditional single-channel/co-planar multi-channel applicators in postoperative vaginal brachytherapy for early-stage endometrial cancer.Methods:CT scan data of 66 patients with stage I endometrial cancer, encompassing 100 3D brachytherapy CT imaging datasets, admitted to Department of Gynecologic Oncology of the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University from December 2021 to June 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. Based on CT images and delineated structures, offline reconstructions of radiotherapy plans were performed for single-channel, coplanar multi-channel, and 3D-printed non-coplanar multi-channel applicators. These 3 radiotherapy plans were optimized, and the high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV) coverage (V 100 ≥90%) and doses to organs at risk (rectum, bladder) were compared. The prescription dose was standardized at 600 cGy, with constraints of rectal D 2 cm3 ≤420 cGy and bladder D 2 cm3 ≤480 cGy. Comparison among multiple groups was conducted by ANOVA. Bonferroni method was used to correct P-values for comparison between two groups. Results:When defined as HR-CTV D 90%≥600 cGy, bladder D 2 cm3 was (398.29±76.13)cGy and rectum D 2 cm3 was (402.10±49.77)cGy of the 3D-printed non-coplanar multi-channel group,which were significantly lower than those in the single-channel group [bladder D 2 cm3 (424.09±131.52) cGy, rectum D 2 cm3 (493.11±115.17) cGy] and coplanar group [bladder D 2 cm3 (461.28±134.84) cGy, rectum D 2 cm3 (508.75±119.02) cGy], respectively. When limiting bladder D 2 cm3≤480 cGy, rectal D 2 cm3 was (446.81±78.53 cGy) of the 3D-printed non-coplanar multi-channel group, which was significantly lower than those in the single-channel group [(589.71±153.91) cGy] and the coplanar group [(545.51±122.00) cGy], respectively. Meanwhile, HR-CTV V 100% (94.53%±3.42%) was higher than (91.19%±7.63%) in the coplanar group. When the rectal D 2 cm3 was ≤ 420 cGy, HR-CTV V 100% was (91.92%±4.04%) of the 3D-printed non-coplanar multi-channel group,which was significantly better than (79.23%±13.95%) in the single-channel group and (85.88%±6.86%) in the coplanar group, respectively. Conclusions:The 3D-printed non-coplanar multi-channel applicator significantly reduces bladder and rectal doses while enhancing target coverage, outperforming traditional single-channel and co-planar multi-channel applicators. This innovation provides an optimized solution for individualized precision radiotherapy.
