Impact of antenatal corticosteroid exposure on neonatal outcomes in late preterm infants
10.3760/cma.j.cn113903-20250204-00054
- VernacularTitle:晚期早产儿产前糖皮质激素暴露对新生儿结局的影响
- Author:
Jun WANG
1
;
Ming LIU
;
Xuejiao SUN
;
Xiaotian NI
;
Fei FU
;
Ling WANG
;
Shengyao LEI
Author Information
1. 太仓市第一人民医院产科，太仓 215400
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Late preterm birth;
Preterm infants;
Antenatal corticosteroids;
Respiratory morbidity
- From:
Chinese Journal of Perinatal Medicine
2025;28(8):625-632
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the impact of antenatal corticosteroid (ACS) exposure on neonatal outcomes in late preterm infants.Methods:This retrospective cohort study analyzed 406 late preterm infants (gestational age 34 +0-36 +6 weeks) born at Tongji University Affiliated Dongfang Hospital between January 2021 and June 2024. Participants were divided into ACS-exposed ( n=254) and control ( n=152) groups. Maternal characteristics, neonatal profiles, and outcomes [respiratory disorders (respiratory distress syndrome, respiratory failure, bronchopulmonary dysplasia), neonatal hypoglycemia, and early-onset sepsis] were compared. And they were stratified by plurality (154 twins, 252 singletons) and gestational age (96 at 34 +0-34 +6 weeks; 111 at 35 +0-35 +6 weeks; 199 at 36 +0-36 +6 weeks), the effects of ACS exposure on neonatal outcomes were analyzed. Late preterm infants were also divided into affected ( n=13) and unaffected ( n=393) groups according to whether they had respiratory disorders, and the risk factors of respiratory disorders were analyzed. Statistical methods included independent t-test, Mann-Whitney U, Chi-square test, and multivariate logistic regression. Results:The ACS-exposed group exhibited significantly higher rates of assisted reproductive technology conception [53.1% (135/254) vs. 37.5% (57/152), χ2=9.37], twin pregnancy [43.3% (110/254) vs. 28.9% (44/152), χ2=6.84], cesarean delivery [83.5% (212/254) vs. 66.4% (101/152), χ2=15.66], and neonatal intensive care unit admission than those in the control group [59.1% (150/254) vs. 40.8% (62/152), χ2=12.61] (all P<0.05). No significant differences emerged between ACS-exposed and control groups in respiratory disorders [3.1% (8/254) vs. 3.3% (5/152), χ2=0.01], early-onset sepsis [1.6% (4/254) vs. 1.3% (2/152), χ2=0.71], or neonatal hypoglycemia [1.6% (4/254) vs. 1.3% (2/152), χ2=0.71] (all P>0.05). Stratified analyses by plurality or gestational age strata revealed no significant differences in respiratory disorders, early-onset sepsis or neonatal hypoglycemia between ACS-exposed and control groups (all P>0.05). Multivariate logistic regression identified ACS exposure as non-protective against respiratory disorders ( OR=0.37, 95% CI: 0.10-1.39, P=0.144), with maternal glucose metabolism disorders (pre-gestational/gestational diabetes) as a risk factor ( OR=5.26, 95% CI: 1.57-17.71, P=0.007) and higher gestational age as protective ( OR=0.34, 95% CI: 0.15-0.78, P=0.012). Conclusions:ACS administration at 34 +0-36 +6 weeks demonstrated no significant benefits for preventing respiratory disorders in late preterm infants and did not increase risks of hypoglycemia or early-onset sepsis. Maternal glucose dysregulation and lower gestational age elevate respiratory morbidity risk in this population.
