Effects of different hemostatic devices on safety and comfort of compression hemostasis in patients after transradial coronary intervention
10.19745/j.1003-8868.2025009
- VernacularTitle:不同止血装置对经桡动脉冠状动脉介入治疗后患者压迫止血的安全性及舒适度的影响研究
- Author:
Yan-ling XU
1
;
Lian-sheng WANG
1
;
Dong-mei SHI
1
Author Information
1. 江苏省人民医院,南京医科大学第一附属医院心血管内科,南京 210029
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
transradial coronary intervention;
STEPTY P hemostatic patch;
spinning tourniquet;
balloon hemastat;
compre-ssion hemostasis;
radial artery
- From:
Chinese Medical Equipment Journal
2025;46(1):49-54
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the effects of different hemostatic devices on the safety and comfort of compression hemostasis in the patients undergoing transradial coronary intervention(TRI).Methods From March to September 2023,900 patients undergoing TRI in the cardiology department of some hospital were divided into three groups according to the randomized numerical table method:STEPTY P hemostatic patch group(group A),spinning hemostatic group(group B)and balloon hemostatic group(group C),with 300 cases in each group.The three groups were compared in terms of the hemostatic effect,local complications and comfort of the puncture sites.Results The three groups had no statistical differences in hematoma grade and incidence rates of hematoma and hemorrhage(all P＞0.05).There were significant differences in the occurrence of skin injury among the three groups(P=0.011),and group A had the skin injury incidence rate(1.0％)statistically lower than those of group B(4.3％)and C(5.3％)(P＜0.05).There were obvious differences among the three groups in the incidence rates of pain on the operative side,palm swelling and limb numbness(P＜0.05),and group A had the incidence rates significantly lower than those of group B and C(all P＜0.05).Conclusion All the three compression hemostatic devices can achieve safe and effective post-TRI hemostasis.When compared with the other two devices,STEPTY P hemostatic patch is more effective in reducing the probability of related complications and improving patient comfort while effectively compressing the puncture site for hemostasis.[Chinese Medical Equipment Journal,2025,46(1):49-54]
