Comparison of the therapeutic effects of different splenectomy and devascularization procedures in the treatment of portal hypertension
10.3760/cma.j.cn113884-20250325-00100
- VernacularTitle:不同脾切除断流术式治疗门静脉高压症的疗效比较
- Author:
Wenyu ZHAO
1
;
Wenlei ZHAO
;
Weihua CHANG
;
Zhengyao CHANG
;
Ying ZHANG
;
Xinglong HU
;
Feng LIANG
;
Ruizhao QI
Author Information
1. 青海大学附属医院肝胆胰外科，西宁 810000
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Laparoscopes;
Partial splenectomy;
Total splenectomy;
Portal hypertension;
Portal vein thrombosis
- From:
Chinese Journal of Hepatobiliary Surgery
2025;31(9):690-695
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To analyze the efficacy of laparoscopic partial splenectomy and devascularization (LPSPD), open partial splenectomy and devascularization (OPSPD), laparoscopic total splenectomy and devascularization (LTSPD), and open total splenectomy and devascularization (OTSPD) in the treatment of portal hypertension.Methods:Clinical data of 128 patients with portal hypertension admitted to the Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery of the Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University and the General Surgery Department of the Fifth Medical Center of the Chinese PLA General Hospital from May 2018 to May 2022 were retrospectively analyzed, including 69 males and 59 females, aged 51.0±10.9 years. According to different surgical methods, patients were divided into four groups, namely the LPSPD group ( n=30), the OPSPD group ( n=32), the LTSPD group ( n=31), and the OTSPD group ( n=35). Operation time, postoperative hospitalization time, postoperative complications such as newly occurred PVT, etc of the four groups of patients were compared. Results:The operation times of the LPSPD, OPSPD, LTSPD and OTSPD group were 240.0 (180.0, 399.0), 209.5 (169.0, 259.0), 207.0 (175.3, 297.5) and 200.0 (162.0, 264.0) minutes, respectively. The postoperative hospital stays were 8.0 (7.0, 12.0), 10.0 (8.3, 11.8), 11.0 (9.0, 13.0) and 13.0 (11.0, 15.0) days, respectively. The incidences of newly occurred PVT after surgery were 3.3% (1/30), 3.1% (1/32), 19.4% (6/31), and 20.0% (7/35), respectively. The above indicators were compared among the four groups respectively, and the differences were statistically significant (all P<0.05). The postoperative hospital stay of the LPSPD group was shorter than that of the LTSPD group [8.0 (7.0, 12.0) vs 11.0 (9.0, 13.0), d, Z=-3.93], and the postoperative hospital stay of the OPSPD group was also shorter than that of the OTSPD group [10.0 (8.3, 11.8) vs 13.0 (11.0, 15.0), d, Z=-3.56; all P<0.001]. The incidence of newly occurred PVT after surgery in the partial splenectomy group (LPSPD and OPSPD) was 3.2% (2/62), which was lower than that in the total splenectomy group [LTSPD and OTSPD, 19.7% (13/66), χ2=8.38, P=0.004]. Conclusion:Compared to total splenectomy, partial splenectomy might be favorable for the shortened postoperative hospital stay and lower incidence of newly occurred portal vein thrombosis.
