A survey of awareness of guidelines and consensus and an analysis of the effectiveness of methodology training among medical staff in otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery
10.3760/cma.j.cn115330-20250419-00238
- VernacularTitle:耳鼻咽喉头颈外科医务人员对指南与共识的认知情况及方法学培训效果分析
- Author:
Hui LIU
1
;
Yuanyuan YAO
;
Zijun WANG
;
Qianling SHI
;
Yishan QIN
;
Honghao LAI
;
Long GE
;
Yaolong CHEN
Author Information
1. 中国医学科学院循证评价与指南研究创新单元（2021RU017）兰州大学基础医学院，兰州 730000
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Clinical practice guidelines;
Expert consensuses;
Cognitive status;
Methodology
- From:
Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery
2025;60(7):824-830
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the awareness of clinical practice guidelines (referred to as "guidelines") and experts consensus (referred to as "consensus") among otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery medical staff, and to analyze the effectiveness of the ninth guideline methodology workshop.Methods:Self-designed survey questionnaires were used to conduct two surveys among otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery medical staff who participated in the ninth guideline methodology workshop held in Chengdu from Jannuary 10 to 11, 2025, both before and after the training, to assess their awareness and knowledge of guideline and consensus development methodology. The effectiveness of the training was evaluated using the paired chi-square test.Results:A total of 77 peoples (95.06%), who participated in the ninth guideline methodology workshop, completed the survey questionnaires both before and after the training. One-third of the respondents reported a relatively good to very good understanding of guideline and consensus development. The overall methodology of the guidelines and consensus they had participated in developing still showed room for improvement. After the methodology training, the score rate for each test question significantly increased compared to before the training ( P<0.05), and the distribution trend of the total scores changed markedly (Before the training, 71 people scored less than 60 points, 4 people scored 60 points, and 2 people scored 70 points. After the training, only 1 person scored less than 60 points, 1 person scored 60 points, and 75 people scored between 70 and 100 points, of which 21 people scored 100 points). Conclusion:The awareness of guideline and consensus development methodology among otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery medical staff still has room for improvement. The guideline methodology workshop can enhance participants′ mastery of guideline and consensus development methodology.
