Efficacy and prognosis of surgical patients with traumatic epidural hematoma straddling the transverse sinus
10.3760/cma.j.cn431274-20240709-01058
- VernacularTitle:创伤性骑跨横窦硬膜外血肿患者的手术效果及预后
- Author:
Yaqiong WANG
1
;
Tianyu YANG
;
Yitong ZHU
;
Jiafa YANG
;
Jingshuang YANG
;
Mengna LIU
;
Zhaofeng LU
Author Information
1. 河南科技大学第一附属医院儿童保健科，河南科技大学临床医学院，洛阳 471000
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Hematoma, epidural, cranial;
Traumatic epidural hematoma straddling transverse sinus;
Craniotomy;
Drainage
- From:
Journal of Chinese Physician
2025;27(7):1024-1029
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To analyze the efficacy and prognosis of surgical patients with traumatic epidural hematoma straddling the transverse sinus (TEHSTS).Methods:Clinical data of 4 360 patients with epidural hematoma admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Science and Technology from January 2010 to April 2024 were collected. Among them, 109 cases (2.5%) were diagnosed with TEHSTS. Based on the rapid progression criteria for posterior fossa epidural hematoma [sudden deterioration of Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score within hours (a decrease of ≥1 point in the best motor response and/or a decrease of ≥2 points in GCS score), and progressive enlargement of TEHSTS on repeat CT scan], the timing and method of surgery were determined. Two surgical approaches were compared: combined supratentorial and infratentorial craniotomy (craniotomy group) and modified supratentorial burr-hole drainage (burr-hole group). Clinical data, surgical timing, surgical outcomes, and prognosis were compared between the two groups.Results:There were 57 cases (52.3%) in the craniotomy group and 52 cases (47.7%) in the modified burr-hole group. The proportion of patients presenting with vomiting upon admission was higher in the craniotomy group than in the burr-hole group [77.2%(44/57) vs 59.6%(31/52), P=0.048], and the proportion of patients with linear occipital fractures on CT was also higher in the craniotomy group [91.2%(52/57) vs 75.0%(39/52), P=0.023]. No significant differences were observed in other admission symptoms or CT findings between the two groups (all P>0.05). The GCS score upon admission was significantly lower in the craniotomy group [(11.0±1.0)points] than in the modified burr-hole group [(13.0±1.0)points] ( P<0.05). Four cases in the burr-hole group developed delayed hematomas, including two cases of bilateral delayed epidural hematomas. The preoperative GCS score in the craniotomy group [(9.0±0.5)points] was significantly lower than upon admission [(11.0±1.0)points] ( P<0.05), and the surgical timing was (6.5±1.5)hours after injury. The preoperative GCS score in the burr-hole group [(11.5±0.5)points] was also significantly lower than upon admission [(13.0±1.0)points] ( P<0.05), with surgical timing at (19.5±5.5)hours after injury. Preoperative CT scans showed no significant difference in hematoma volume between the burr-hole group [(35.5±7.5)ml] and the craniotomy group [(36.5±9.5)ml] ( P>0.05). The preoperative GCS score was significantly lower in the craniotomy group than in the burr-hole group ( P<0.05). The GCS scores at 24 hours postoperatively were significantly improved compared to preoperative scores in both groups (all P<0.05). The burr-hole group had significantly shorter operative time, less intraoperative blood loss, shorter intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and shorter hospital stay than the craniotomy group (all P<0.01). The incidence of postoperative pulmonary infection was lower in the burr-hole group than in the craniotomy group ( P<0.05). At 3-month follow-up, the rate of good recovery [Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) score≥4 points] was significantly higher in the burr-hole group (98.1%) than in the craniotomy group (93.0%) ( P<0.01). Conclusions:TEHSTS should be managed with different surgical approaches based on admission symptoms, GCS score, and the speed of disease progression. The modified burr-hole drainage procedure is convenient, safe, and associated with better prognosis.
