Flight fatigue among helicopter flying personnel and contributing factors
10.3760/cma.j.cn113854-20240531-00091
- VernacularTitle:直升机飞行人员飞行疲劳现况及影响因素分析
- Author:
Tunan CHEN
1
;
Yan LIU
;
Xue YANG
;
Baoquan CHENG
;
Zhenhao FENG
;
Jishu XIAN
;
Rui WANG
;
Yanchun ZHANG
;
Lihua WANG
Author Information
1. 陆军军医大学第一附属医院神经外科，重庆400038
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Fatigue;
Analysis of contributors;
Surveys and questionnaires;
Helicopter flying personnel
- From:
Chinese Journal of Aerospace Medicine
2025;36(3):167-174
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the prevalence of flight fatigue among helicopter flying personnel and analyze its contributors in order to provide data for related interventions.Methods:A cross-sectional study was conducted among 404 helicopter flying personnel between October 8, 2021 and July 31, 2022. Data was collected using a self-designed questionnaire, involving the demography of these subjects, sleep-related factors, flight fatigue, perceived causes of fatigue and coping strategies. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) and Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFI-20) were used to assess sleep quality, mental workload, and levels of flight fatigue over the past month. The total scores of MFI-20 were compared across demographic groups, and correlations with PSQI and NASA-TLX scores were analyzed. Multiple linear regression was performed to identify the determinants of flight fatigue.Results:①Demography: among the 404 helicopter flying personnel, 92.8% (375/404) were pilots and 7.2% (29/404) navigators. As for years of service, 41.6% (168/404) served less than 5 years, while 58.4% (236/404) served more than 5 years. 37.9% (153/404) had a family history of insomnia. 18.8% (76/404) did not habitually nap, 68.9% (226/328) napped for ≤30 min, 31.1% (102/328) napped over 30 min, and 18.3% (74/404) had insomnia over the past month. As for helicopter flying personnel, 75.5% (305/404) reported experiencing fatigue, with 69.1% (279/404) attributing it to flight-related factors and 51.5% (208/404) using coffee as a countermeasure.②Scale scores: the total score of PSQI was [5 (3, 7)], while the highest daytime dysfunction score was [1(0, 2)]. The total score of NASA-TLX was [39.19 (26.57, 51.97)], and the effort score was the highest [10.31(5.07, 14.60)]. The total score of MFI-20 averaged (47.28±14.88), with the mental fatigue score being the highest [(10.03±4.42)]. ③Comparisons of MFI-20 total scores: flying personnel with ≤5 years of flying experience had higher MFI-20 total scores than those with >5 years, and those with a family history of insomnia had higher scores than those without ( t=3.35, 2.44, P=0.001, 0.015). Individuals with insomnia over the past month had higher scores than non-insomniacs ( t=3.33, P=0.001). Significant differences in MFI-20 scores were observed based on nap duration ( F=19.95, P<0.001). Non-nappers had higher scores than those napping for ≤30 min ( P=0.005). Flying personnel who napped for >30 min had higher scores than those did not ( P=0.043) or napped for ≤30 min ( P<0.001). ④Correlation analysis: the total score of MFI-20 was positively correlated with sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep disturbances, hypnotic medications, daytime dysfunction, and the total score of PSQI ( r=0.118-0.226, all P<0.05), but negatively with sleep duration ( r=-0.136, P=0.006). The total score of MFI-20 was positively correlated with mental demand, physical demand, and the total score of NASA-TLX ( r=0.119, 0.168, 0.184, P=0.017, 0.001, <0.001). ⑤Multiple linear regression analysis: the determinants of flight fatigue included aircraft types ( B=-4.956, 95% CI:-8.124--1.788), nap duration ( B=3.693, 95% CI: 1.267-6.119), sleep latency ( B=2.371, 95% CI: 0.229-4.513), sleep duration ( B=-7.383, 95% CI:-10.008--4.758), daytime dysfunction ( B=5.003, 95% CI: 2.967-7.039) and physical workload ( B=0.611, 95% CI: 0.324-0.898). Conclusions:Helicopter flying personnel are vulnerable to flight fatigue, which is strongly linked to sleep quality and mental workload. It is crucial to address flying personnel′s self-perceived fatigue, care about fatigue manifestations across aircraft types, and implement targeted interventions to improve sleep quality and reduce mental workload.
