Characteristics and determinants of total cerebral small vascular disease scores in pilots
10.3760/cma.j.cn113854-20240329-00041-1
- VernacularTitle:飞行员脑小血管病影像学总体负荷评分及影响因素分析
- Author:
Bei PAN
1
;
Xiangsheng LI
;
Jinlong ZHANG
;
Xinxin CHANG
;
Wenjin DU
;
Wei LIU
;
Dawei CHEN
Author Information
1. 空军军医大学空军特色医学中心神经内科，北京100142
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Cerebral small vessel diseases;
Magnetic resonance imaging;
Risk factors;
Retrospective studies;
Pilots
- From:
Chinese Journal of Aerospace Medicine
2025;36(1):18-25
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the characteristics and determinants of total scores of cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) and to analyze the factors associated with enlarged perivascular space (EPVS) grading in pilots.Methods:The physical examination data of 72 pilots who were hospitalized and diagnosed with CSVD by MRI in the Air Force Medical Center (General Hospital of Air Force) between 2019 and 2022 was retrospectively analyzed. The pilots were grouped by the total CSVD score (0, 1, 2, 3, 4 points), and the distribution of CSVD imaging biomarkers was compared across groups. The severity of EPVS was classified into 3 levels: none or mild (0-10), moderate (11-20), and severe (>20). The impact of vascular risk factors on the total CSVD score and EPVS grading was analyzed.Results:The results of the total CSVD score showed that there were 19 cases (26.39%) with a score of 0, 43 cases (59.72%) with a score of 1, 10 cases (13.89%) with a score of 2, and 0 case with scores of 3 or 4. Among those who scored 1, there were 2 cases (4.65%) of lacunar infarction (LA), 1 case (2.33%) of moderate to severe white matter hyperintensity (WMH), 2 cases (4.65%) of cerebral microbleed (CMB), and 38 cases (88.37%) of moderate and severe EPVS. Among those who scored 2, there were 7 cases (70.00%) of LA combined with EPVS, 2 cases (20.00%) of CMB combined with EPVS, and 1 case (10.00%) of WMH combined with EPVS. According to the CSVD imaging classification of these pilots, there were 9 cases (12.50%) of LA, 52 cases (72.22%) of WMH, 4 cases (5.60%) of CMB and 61 cases (84.72%) of EPVS. Multiple ordered Logistic regression analysis showed that systolic blood pressure ( OR=1.068, 95% CI: 1.016-1.122) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ( OR=0.111, 95% CI: 0.015-0.843) made a difference in the total CSVD score. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol ( OR=0.166, 95% CI: 0.031-0.893) could affect the EPVS grading. Spearman′s correlation analysis showed that the systolic blood pressure level was positively correlated with the total CSVD score ( r=0.299, P=0.011), while the high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level was negatively correlated with the total CSVD score and EPVS grading ( r=-0.313, -0.263, P=0.041, 0.026). Conclusions:The total CSVD score of pilots is at a mild level with EPVS as the leading contributor. The systolic blood pressure and the high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level are determinants for the total CSVD score, while the high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level is a determinant for the EPVS grading of pilots. Blood pressure control and lipid regulation can go a long way towards preventing CSVD in pilots. The total CSVD score is of value for stratified evaluation and individual identification of pilots with CSVD.
