Safety of budesonide inhalation aerosol for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease:a Meta-analysis
10.12173/j.issn.1005-0698.202501001
- VernacularTitle:布地格福吸入气雾剂治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病安全性的Meta分析
- Author:
Honghua QIN
1
;
Haiyan GUO
;
Haifeng LI
;
Xiaona TONG
;
Ying WANG
Author Information
1. 大理大学药学院(云南大理 671000);云南省第三人民医院药剂科(昆明 650011)
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Budesonide;
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease;
Adverse drug reaction;
Meta-analysis;
Randomized controlled trial
- From:
Chinese Journal of Pharmacoepidemiology
2025;34(7):771-784
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To systematically review the safety of budesonide inhalation aerosol in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Methods PubMed,Cochrane Library,Web of Science,Embase,CNKI,WanFang Data,VIP and SinoMed databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials on budesonide inhalation aerosol in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease from inception to June 30,2024.Two reviewers independently screened literature,extracted data,and assessed the risk of bias of included studies.The Meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software.Results A total of 52 studies with 16,768 patients were included.Meta-analysis results showed that the incidence of respiratory system adverse drug reaction(ADR)was higher in the budesonide group than in the control group,with a statistically significant difference[OR=1.18,95%CI(1.10,1.27),P<0.001].There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of overall ADR,central and peripheral nervous system ADR,gastrointestinal system ADR,skin ADR,urinary system ADR,infectious disease ADR,and musculoskeletal system ADR between the two groups of patients(P>0.05).According to the subgroup analysis of the treatment course,in the 3-6 month subgroup,the incidence of ADR was higher in the budesonide group than in the control group,with a statistically significant difference[OR=1.43,95%CI(1.18,1.74),P<0.001].In the studies with a treatment duration of more than 6 months,the incidence of ADR was higher in the budesonide group than in the control group,with a statistically significant difference[OR=1.54,95%CI(1.16,2.03),P=0.002].In the study of unknown treatment course,the incidence of ADR in the budesonide group was lower than that in the control group,and the difference was statistically significant[OR=0.39,95%CI(0.20,0.76),P=0.005].In the studies with a treatment duration of less than 3 months,the incidence of ADR in the budesonidegroup was comparable to that in the control group(P>0.05).Conclusion The incidence of respiratory ADR caused by budesonide is higher than that of the control group.Although the incidence of overall ADR is not statistically significant,the occurrence of systemic adverse reactions should continue to be closely monitored in the future treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.