A randomized controlled study on enhanced regimens of bowel preparation of linaclotide combined with compound polyethylene glycol electrolyte powder
10.3760/cma.j.cn321463-20231207-00389
- VernacularTitle:利那洛肽联合复方聚乙二醇电解质散肠道准备改良方案的随机对照研究
- Author:
Lixin TANG
1
;
Yudong GUO
;
Shixue LI
;
Xiufen TANG
Author Information
1. 黑龙江省医院消化病院消化一科，哈尔滨 150001
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Bowel preparation;
Linaclotide;
Oral sulfate solution;
Polyethylene glycol
- From:
Chinese Journal of Digestive Endoscopy
2025;42(2):120-124
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To explore the efficacy of linaclotide combined with compound polyethylene glycol (PEG) on bowel preparation, and compare it with traditional PEG 3 L and oral sulfate solution (OSS) 3 L methods.Methods:Patients aged 18-70 years who underwent colonoscopy at the Digestive Diseases Hospital, Heilongjiang Provincial Hospital from January to June 2023 were continuously enrolled in the randomized controlled trial and randomly divided into 3 groups using the random number table. Intestinal preparation was conducted according to the protocols of each group, Group A: 3 L PEG; Group B: 3 L OSS; Group C: 290 μg of linaclotide + 2 L PEG. The effects of bowel preparation, adverse reactions, satisfaction, and willingness for repeated bowel preparation were compared.Results:A total of 360 patients were included in the analysis, with 120 patients in each group. There were no statistically significant differences in the median Boston bowel preparation score for each intestinal segment or the total score among the 3 groups (left colon: 3 VS 2 VS 3, H=0.371, P=0.831; transverse colon: 3 VS 3 VS 3, H=0.487, P=0.784; right colon: 2 VS 2 VS 2, H=1.088, P=0.580; total score: 8 VS 8 VS 8, H=0.017, P=0.991). Among the adverse reactions, the incidence of nausea and vomiting in Group B [3.33% (4/120)] was lower than that in Group A [12.50% (15/120), χ2=8.042, P=0.018], and there were no statistically significant differences in other adverse reactions among the 3 groups ( P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the satisfaction level among the 3 groups ( χ2=11.840, P=0.158). The willingness to undergo bowel preparation again in Group C [95.83% (115/120)] and Group B [96.67% (116/120)] was higher than that in Group A [85.00% (102/120)] (Group C VS Group A: χ2=8.127, P=0.004; Group B VS Group A: χ2=9.808, P=0.002), and there was no significant difference between Group C and B ( χ2=0.000, P=1.000). Conclusion:Linaclotide combined with 2 L PEG offers comparable bowel preparation efficacy and safety to 3 L PEG or 3 L OSS, with improved patient compliance due to reduced water intake, suggesting its potential as an enhanced bowel preparation regimen.
