Application of Battlefield First-aid Simulated Training System in the non-academic education training for health sergeants
10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20231011-01991
- VernacularTitle:战现场急救模拟训练系统在卫生军士非学历教育培训中的应用研究
- Author:
Kaiyue LI
1
;
Li GUI
;
Tianshuai ZHANG
;
Yixin WANG
Author Information
1. 海军军医大学护理系，上海 200433
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Battlefield first aid;
Simulated training system;
Military medicine;
Health service;
Experiential learning
- From:
Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research
2025;24(7):962-968
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To design and develop a battlefield first-aid simulated training system, to evaluate the application effect of the system through a quasi-experimental controlled trial, and to provide training means to support the enhancement of Chinese army's first-line treatment capability.Methods:A battlefield first-aid simulated training system was designed and developed with the guidance of the theory of "experiential learning cycle". From March to June 2023, 108 health sergeants who participated in non-academic education training from a military medical university were recruited to a quasi-experimental controlled trial and randomly divided into a control group and an experimental group, with 54 sergeants each. The control group was trained using traditional face-to-face simulation training, and the experimental group was trained using the Battlefield First-aid Simulated Training System. The differences in effects of computer simulation training and traditional face-to-face simulation training were compared, with the primary evaluation indices being the first-aid knowledge level and inferential capability of rescue on the battlefield, and the secondary evaluation indices being the self-perception and training satisfaction. The SPSS 26.0 software was used for conducting the t test, chi-square test or Fisher's exact probability test, and non-parametric test. Results:All 108 subjects completed the training and had an improvement in the knowledge level, self-perception, and inferential capability of rescue after the training ( P<0.001). The difference in the degree of improvement in the knowledge level [(19.93±8.98) vs. (16.55±10.10)] and self-perception [10.50 (7.00, 13.25) vs. 10.00 (7.00, 12.50)] was not statistically significant between the experimental group and the control group ( P>0.05), but the degree of improvement in the inferential capability of rescue of the experimental group [6.00 (5.00, 9.25)] was significantly lower than that of the control group [8.00 (7.00, 11.00)] ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the training satisfaction scores between the two groups ( P>0.05). Conclusions:The system has a similar training effect to traditional face-to-face simulation training, but shows a slight deficiency in the improvement in the inferential capability of rescue. It serves as a recommended training resource and format from battlefield first-aid theory learning to practical application. The system still needs to be optimized and improved in the aspects of functionality, simulation, and intellectualization in the future.
