Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (Hypo-) Manic Episode with Mixed Features- DSM-5 Module in patients with a manic episode
10.3760/cma.j.cn113661-20200619-00279
- VernacularTitle:简明国际神经精神访谈躁狂发作伴混合特征问卷中文版信效度研究
- Author:
Yue FEI
1
;
Leping HUANG
;
Yu WANG
;
Haichen YANG
;
Xujuan LI
;
Wenfei LI
;
Bixiu YANG
;
Zhenghui YI
;
Zuowei WANG
Author Information
1. 上海市虹口区精神卫生中心心境障碍科 200083
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Bipolar disorder;
Reproducibility of results;
Mixed Features;
Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview
- From:
Chinese Journal of Psychiatry
2020;53(6):501-507
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:The reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (Hypo-) Manic Episode with Mixed Features- DSM-5 module (MINI-M) were tested in patients with a hypomanic or manic episode.Methods:After sinicization of MINI-M, a total of 110 patients with hypomanic or manic episode were recruited into this multiple-centre study through a convenience sampling, and completed the questionnaires by themselves. The reliability of MINI-M was analyzed with Cronbach′s α and Spearman′s r of item-to-total and test-retest correlations. Principal component analysis (PCA) and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) were conducted to explore the structural validity of MINI-M. questionnaire. The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) based on clinical diagnosis was used to analyze the predictive validity.Results:The internal consistency Cronbach′s α of the MINI-M was 0.840, the correlation coefficients of item-to-total were 0.549-0.834 ( P<0.05), the test-retest reliability over one-week interval was 0.621 ( P<0.05). The PCA and EFA supported a single factor with strong loadings for all 6 items, which could explain 55.795% of the total variance. The ROC analysis showed that the optimal cut-off was 2 for distinguishing mixed features from the manic episode with a sensitivity of 0.800 and a specificity of 0.711. The MINI-M determined 38.2%(42/110) of patients with mixed features, which was higher than 18.2% (20/110) diagnosed by routine psychiatric interview. Conclusions:The findings demonstrate that the Chinese version of MINI-M is a reliable and valid tool for recognizing mixed features in patients with a hypomanic or manic episode, and helpful for raising the clinical diagnosis of mixed features.
