Comparison on the treatment of proliferative diabetic retinopathy with ranibizumab and conbercept adjuvant for pars plana vitrectomy
10.3760/cma.j.cn511434-20240805-00299
- VernacularTitle:雷珠单抗与康柏西普辅助玻璃体切割手术治疗增生型糖尿病视网膜病变的疗效对比观察
- Author:
Xinzhi SONG
1
;
Yuxia FAN
;
Xiangli WANG
;
Ying WANG
;
Xuemei ZHANG
Author Information
1. 甘肃省人民医院眼科, 兰州 730000
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Proliferative diabetic retinopathy;
Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor drugs;
Adjuvant therapy;
Pars plana vitrectomy;
Curative effect observation
- From:
Chinese Journal of Ocular Fundus Diseases
2025;41(1):15-20
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the outcomes of ranibizumab and conbercept adjunct for pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) in the treatment of proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR).Methods:A prospective randomized case-control study. From June 2022 to December 2023, 90 cases (90 eyes) of PDR patients diagnosed through ophthalmic examination at Department of Ophthalmology of Gansu Provincial Hospital were included in the study. All patients underwent the best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure, B-mode ultrasound, and optical coherence tomography (OCT) examinations. The central macular thickness (CMT) was measured using an OCT instrument. The patients were randomly divided into a intravitreal injection of ranibizumab group (monoclonal-antibody group) and a intravitreal injection of conbercept group (fusion-protein group) using a random number table method, with 45 cases (45 eyes) in each group. Two groups of patients were intravitreal injected with 10 mg/ml ranibizumab or conbercept 0.05 ml, respectively. A standard 23G PPV was performed through the flat part of the ciliary body 3-7 days after intravitreal injection. Relevant examinations were performed using the same equipments and methods as before surgery at postoperative 1 week, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. The PPV time, intraoperative use of intraocular electrocoagulation, incidence of iatrogenic retinal breaks, and sterile air or silicone oil tamponade rate in the vitreous cavity, the postoperative changes of BCVA and CMT, and incidence of complications were compared between two groups. Independent sample t test was used for inter group comparison. Results:The intraoperative utilization rate of intraocular electrocoagulation in the monoclonal-antibody group was higher than that in the fusion-protein group, and the difference was statistically significant ( χ2=3.876, P<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in the PPV time ( t=0.152), intraoperative bleeding rate ( χ2=0.800), incidence of iatrogenic retinal breaks ( χ2=1.975), and sterile air and silicone oil tamponade rate in the vitreous cavity ( χ2=1.607, 1.553) between the two groups ( P>0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in early and late postoperative vitreous hemorrhage ( χ2=1.235, 2.355), and re-PPV ( χ2=2.355) between two groups ( P>0.05). The BCVA of the fusion-protein group was significantly better than that of the monoclonal-antibody group at postoperative 3 months, and the difference was statistically significant ( t=2.428, P<0.05). The CMT of the fusion-protein group was lower than that in the monoclonal-antibody group at postoperative 1 week, and the difference was statistically significant ( t=2.739, P<0.05). None of the patients experienced endophthalmitis, retinal artery occlusion, or severe cardiovascular events after surgery. Conclusion:Compared with intravitreal injection of ranibizumab before PPV, intravitreal injection of conbercept before PPV in PDR patients can shorten the surgical time, reduce intraoperative bleeding rate, lower the rate of electrocoagulation and intraocular tamponade, and incidence of iatrogenic retinal breaks, and improve the visual acuity.
