A comparative study of anterior versus posterior cervical approaches in the sagittal plane reconstruction for unstable Hangman fractures
10.3760/cma.j.cn115530-20250127-00039
- VernacularTitle:颈椎前路与后路手术治疗不稳定性Hangman骨折矢状面重建的比较研究
- Author:
Yinyu FANG
1
;
Yu WANG
1
;
Haibo LI
1
;
Jun JIANG
1
;
Bin WANG
1
;
Yang YU
1
;
Yong QIU
1
;
Zezhang ZHU
1
Author Information
1. 南京大学医学院附属鼓楼医院骨科-脊柱外科，南京 210008
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Axis;
Fractures, bone;
Dislocation;
Sagittal alignment;
Anterior;
Posterior
- From:
Chinese Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
2025;27(4):314-321
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and posterior cervical fusion (PCF) in the sagittal plane reconstruction for unstable Hangman fractures.Methods:A retrospective study was conducted to analyze the clinical data of 43 patients who had been surgically treated at Division of Spine Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital for unstable Hangman fractures from January 2007 to December 2022. There were 32 males and 11 females aged (47.9±14.2) years. They were divided into 2 groups according to their surgical methods: an anterior group of 23 cases who were subjected to ACDF and a posterior group of 20 cases who were subjected to PCE. The 2 groups were compared in terms of operation time, intraoperative bleeding, hospitalization time, and the C 2 subluxation, occipitocervical angle, C 2-C 3 angle, cervical lordosis (CL), and cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA) measured on the lateral cervical spine X-rays over the time points of hospital admission, immediate postoperation, and the final follow-up, as well as in terms of the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and neck disability index (NDI) over the time points of hospital admission and the final follow-up. The American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) classification was used to assess the neurological status of the patients before surgery and at the final follow-up, and complications were documented. Results:The differences in preoperative general data between the 2 groups were not statistically significant, indicating comparability ( P>0.05). The operation time [(90.3±13.6) min] and hospitalization time [(13.1±2.4) d] in the anterior group were significantly shorter than those in the posterior group [(153.9±26.1) min and (18.5±1.9) d], and the intraoperative bleeding volume in the anterior group [(57.2±15.9) mL] was significantly less than that in the posterior group [(123.2±22.5) mL] ( P<0.05). Compared with the preoperative period in both groups, the C 2 subluxation and C 2-C 3 angle were significantly corrected at immediate postoperation, and well maintained at the final follow-up. The C 2-C 3 angle was significantly better corrected in the anterior group than in the posterior group at immediate postoperation and the final follow-up. The VAS scores and NDI at the final follow-up in both groups were significantly lower than those at admission ( P<0.05), while the differences between the 2 groups were not statistically significant ( P>0.05). Four cases in the anterior group and 2 cases in the posterior group all had their preoperative ASIA grade D improved to grade E at the final follow-up. Three patients in the anterior group developed postoperative hoarseness, which returned to normal at the 3-month follow-up. There was no hoarseness or dysphagia at the final follow-up. Both groups achieved fine fusion at the final follow-up, showing no complications like loosening or fracture of internal fixation. Conclusion:In the sagittal plane reconstruction for unstable Hangman fractures, both ACDF and PCF can lead to satisfactory clinical and radiological outcomes, but the former shows a significant advantage in reconstruction of C 2-C 3 lordosis.
