Analysis of the therapeutic outcome of consciousness disorders following brain injuries caused by different mechanisms
10.3760/cma.j.cn311847-20201118-00429
- VernacularTitle:不同致伤机制脑损伤性意识障碍转归分析
- Author:
Xingming PAN
1
;
Xiaolei ZHANG
1
;
Xinjia TIAN
1
;
Zhiqiang GAO
1
Author Information
1. 南京紫金医院，南京 210007
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Brain injury;
Consciousness disorder;
Etiology;
Outcome
- From:
Chinese journal of nautical medicine and hyperbaric medicine
2022;29(2):184-187
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To explore the therapeutic outcome of consciousness disorders induced by different brain injury mechanisms.Methods:A total of 130 patients with impaired consciousness after brain injuries treated in Nanjing Zijin Hospital from January 2016 to May 2021 were taken as research subjects. According to the causes of injury，they were divided into cerebrovascular accident group（ n = 37），brain trauma group（ n=68），hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy group（ n = 7），and cerebral aneurysm group（ n = 18）. The patients in the four groups were all given comprehensive treatment，including hyperbaric oxygen（HBO）therapy，electrical stimulation，acupuncture，passive training，and drug therapy. The Glasgow Coma Scale（GCS）scores and China Nanjing persistent vegetative state scale（CNPVSS）scores of the four groups before treatment and after three months of comprehensive treatment combined with HBO were compared，and the consciousness recovery rate and the overall curative effect of the four groups were also compared. Results:After three months of comprehensive treatment combined with HBO，the GCS scores and CNPVSS scores of the four groups were improved compared with those before treatment（all P < 0.05）；the most significant increase of GCS scores and CNPVSS scores was in the cerebral aneurysm group. The highest consciousness recovery rate was in the cerebrovascular accident group（64.86%，24/37），followed by cerebral aneurysm group（55.56%，10/18），and there were statistically significant differences in the consciousness recovery rate among the four groups（ P < 0.01）. The overall effective rate was in the descending order of cerebrovascular accident group［86.49%（32/37）］，cerebral aneurysm group［83.33%（15/18）］，brain trauma group［69.12%（47/68）］，and hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy group［42.86%（3/7）］，with statistically significant differences（ P < 0.05）. The cerebrovascular accident group and the cerebral aneurysm group achieve higher consciousness recovery rates and greater improvement in consciousness disturbance compared with the other two groups after three months of comprehensive treatment combined with HBO. Conclusion:Different injury mechanisms affect the therapeutic outcomes of consciousness disorders induced by brain injuries.
