Evaluation of hemolysis quality of specimens by fully automated blood collection robot
10.3760/cma.j.cn114452-20240909-00499
- VernacularTitle:全自动采血机器人对标本溶血情况改善的评估
- Author:
Chong WANG
1
;
Meixiu GU
;
Jie ZHU
;
Peiqi FANG
;
Wenjia TANG
;
Zizhong LIU
;
Baishen PAN
;
Beili WANG
;
Wei GUO
Author Information
1. 复旦大学附属中山医院检验科，上海 200032
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Robotics;
Hemolysis;
Before analysis;
Intelligent blood collection robot;
Influence factor
- From:
Chinese Journal of Laboratory Medicine
2025;48(8):1080-1084
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the differences in specimen results between the intelligent robotic phlebotomy group and the manual venipuncture group, and to evaluate the clinical applicability of the autonomous blood collection system.Methods:From January 20 to October 28, 2022, 154 volunteers at Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University underwent paired blood collections (robotic and manual) within 5 minutes. The collected samples were analyzed for: hemolysis index (HI), alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate transaminase (AST), L-γ-glutamyltransferase (γ-GT), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), urea nitrogen (UREA), creatinine (CRE), uric acid (UA), glucose (GLU), total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), natrium (Na), kalium (K), chlorine (Cl), creatine kinase (CK), CK-MB, CK-MM, and neuron-specific enolase (NSE). Statistical analyses used t-tests and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests.Results:The results of two different blood collection methods revealed that the HI values of 154 specimens in the intelligent robot blood collection group were all less than 20SI, while 7 specimens (4.54%) in the manual blood collection group had HI values exceeding 20SI; In the comparison of 17 biochemical and immunological markers, there were statistically significant differences between groups in 8 items including γ-GT[20.00(15.00, 37.75)U/L vs. 19.00 (14.00, 36.25)U/L, Z=2.497, P<0.05], LDH[165.5 (147.0, 183.0)U/L vs. 173.0 (155.0, 193.0)U/L, Z=8.629, P<0.05], TC[(5.002±0.856)mmol/L vs.(5.031±0.870) mmol/L, t=-3.006, P<0.05], K[4.1 (4.0, 4.3)mmol/L vs. 4.3 (4.1, 4.4)mmol/L, Z=5.592, P<0.05], CK[97.00 (73.00, 133.00)U/L vs. 99.00 (74.75, 136.25)U/L, Z=3.490, P<0.05], CK-MB[13 (11, 15)U/L vs. 14 (12, 16)U/L, Z=6.581, P<0.05], CK-MM[84.00 (60.00, 119.00)U/L vs. 83.50 (58.75, 118.00)U/L, Z=3.790, P<0.05], and NSE[10.600 (9.500, 11.700)ng/ml vs. 11.950 (10.475, 13.725)ng/ml, Z=8.151, P<0.05]. Conclusions:In the collection of serum samples, intelligent blood collection robots can achieve standardization and normalization of specimen collection volume and mixing in the pre-analysis stage. The hemolysis related indicators of the collected specimens are lower than those of the manual collection group, and can be used for the collection of clinical serological specimens.
