Diagnostic value of D-dimer combined with NT-proBNP and neutrophil percentage in differentiating acute aortic dissection from acute myocardial infarction and pulmonary embolism
10.3760/cma.j.cn114452-20250311-00150
- VernacularTitle:D-二聚体联合NT-proBNP及中性粒细胞百分比在急性主动脉夹层与急性心肌梗死及肺栓塞鉴别诊断中的应用价值
- Author:
Guoyan ZHU
1
;
Ximing WANG
1
;
Dongze YU
1
;
Kai CUI
1
;
Zhou ZHOU
1
;
Jinxing YU
1
Author Information
1. 中国医学科学院 北京协和医学院 国家心血管病中心 阜外医院实验诊断中心，北京 100037
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Aortic, dissection;
Acute myocardial infarction;
Pulmonary embolism;
D-dimer;
Combined diagnosis
- From:
Chinese Journal of Laboratory Medicine
2025;48(8):985-991
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the application value of D-dimer (D-D) as the primary indicator, combined with NT-proBNP and neutrophil percentage in the differential diagnosis of acute aortic dissection (AAD), pulmonary embolism (PE), and acute myocardial infarction (AMI).Methods:A retrospective case-control study was conducted, including 764 patients with acute chest pain who presented to the Emergency Department of Beijing Fuwai Hospital from March 1st, 2024, to February 28th, 2025. Patients were clinically diagnosed with AAD (299 cases) and other acute chest pain conditions (AMI 425 cases, PE 40 cases). The AAD group had the age of 56.00 (45.00, 64.00) years old with 226 males (75.59%); the AMI group had a median the age of 65.00 (55.00, 70.00) years with 339 males (79.76%); and the PE group had the age of 70.00 (59.75, 74.00) years with 15 males (37.50%). Baseline clinical data were collected and compared among the three groups, including general parameters such as heart rate, systolic blood pressure, and diastolic blood pressure. Laboratory parameters included N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), D-D, cardiac troponin I (cTnI), myoglobin, creatine kinase-MB (CK-MB), white blood cell count, neutrophil percentage, lymphocyte percentage, platelet count, and mean platelet volume (MPV). Comparisons between groups were performed using the Kruskal-Wallis rank-sum test and χ2 test. Independent discriminatory factors were identified through multivariate logistic regression analysis, and the diagnostic performance of individual indicators and combined models were analyzed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.Results:The D-D level in the AAD group [3.93 (1.48, 19.59) μg/ml] was significantly higher than that in the AMI group [0.26 (0.14, 0.56) μg/ml] and PE group [2.13 (0.84, 6.13) μg/ml] ( F=200.12, P<0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that D-D, NT-proBNP, neutrophil percentage, and lymphocyte percentage were all independent factors for differentiating AAD from AMI. NT-proBNP, total white blood cell count, neutrophil percentage, and lymphocyte percentage were independent predictors for differentiating AAD from PE. ROC analysis showed that D-D had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.93 (95% CI 0.91-0.95) for differentiating AAD from AMI, with a sensitivity of 81.6% and specificity of 92.9%. In the differential diagnosis between AAD and PE, the model combining D-dimer, NT-proBNP, and neutrophil percentage had an AUC of 0.86 (95% CI 0.80-0.91), with a sensitivity of 85.0% and a specificity of 72.5%. Conclusion:D-D has significant value in the differential diagnosis of AAD from AMI and PE, with particularly good individual diagnostic performance for differentiating AAD from AMI. Combining NT-proBNP and neutrophil percentage can significantly improve differential diagnostic performance.
