Proficiency testing for 11 clinical biobanks in Beijing City: simulation study and result analysis
10.3760/cma.j.cn112150-20250522-00465
- VernacularTitle:北京市11家临床生物样本库能力验证模拟研究和结果分析
- Author:
Qian ZHANG
1
;
Yun ZHANG
;
Lu HAN
;
Min LIU
;
Yongbo YU
;
Yan WANG
;
Ying HU
;
Hui ZHONG
;
Dan GUO
;
Shipeng SUN
;
Jinxi LIN
;
Siyuan XU
;
Xiaokun TANG
;
Gaoyuan SUN
;
Chuanbao ZHANG
;
Hexin LI
Author Information
1. 北京医院检验科，国家老年医学中心，中国医学科学院老年医学研究院，北京100730
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Biobank;
Quality control;
Protein stability;
Proficiency testing
- From:
Chinese Journal of Preventive Medicine
2025;59(9):1590-1596
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To evaluate the sample preparation proficiency and storage proficiency of 11 clinical biobanks in Beijing through simulated experiments, and to establish an assessment method for the quality comparability of biological samples.Methods:An exploratory research design was adopted. In November 2023, artificial composite serum quality control materials containing six recombinant human protein markers—recombinant human alanine aminotransferase (rhALT), recombinant human aspartate aminotransferase (rhAST), recombinant human creatine kinase (rhCK), recombinant human creatine kinase-MB (rhCK-MB), recombinant human B-type natriuretic peptide (rhBNP), and recombinant human troponin I (rhTNI)—were distributed to 11 clinical biobanks in Beijing City. Sample preparation and storage followed the standardized operating procedures. Proficiency differences were assessed through statistical analysis.Results:Three-way repeated measures ANOVA revealed all six protein markers showed a declining trend over storage time in ultra-low-temperature environments ( F values 11.68-4 179.66, all P<0.01). However, neither long-term/temporary refrigerator types ( F values 0.01-1.23, all P>0.05)nor placement locations within refrigerators significantly affected the stability of these six proteins ( F valus 0.03-1.47, all P>0.05). The biases in detection results for rhALT, rhAST, rhTNI, and rhBNP at different storage time points were within the allowable bias limits for each item, supporting their use as markers for protein stability in biobank samples. All 11 institutions passed the storage proficiency assessment. In the preparation proficiency assessment, deviations were observed in post-preparation sample results, with a notably high out-of-control rate for rhCK (36.36%). Conclusion:Sample preparation proficiency can serve as a quality control metric for clinical biobanks. Future external quality assessment systems for biobanks should focus on sample preparation rather than storage processes.
