A comparative study of novel en-bloc HoLEP with complete membranous urethral mucosa sparing technique and traditional 2-lobe technique HoLEP in BPH patients
10.3760/cma.j.cn112330-20241112-00503
- VernacularTitle:完整保留膜部尿道黏膜的改良整叶法与传统两叶法HoLEP治疗BPH的疗效比较
- Author:
Qifeng CAO
1
;
Ning SHAO
1
;
Jian KANG
1
;
Xingang CUI
1
;
Ding XU
1
Author Information
1. 上海交通大学医学院附属新华医院泌尿外科，上海 200092
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Prostatic hyperplasia;
Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate;
Novel en-bloc HoLEP;
Complete membranous urethral mucosa sparing technique;
Safety;
Effic
- From:
Chinese Journal of Urology
2025;46(5):383-388
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the safety and efficacy of novel en-bloc Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate（HoLEP）with complete membranous urethral mucosa sparing technique with traditional 2-lobe technique HoLEP in benign prostatic hyperplasia（BPH）treatment.Methods:The data of BPH patients treated with HoLEP from January 2023 to May 2024 in Xinhua Hospital，School of Medicine，Shanghai Jiaotong University were retrospectively reviewed. Seventy-two patients received novel en-bloc HoLEP with complete membranous urethral mucosa sparing technique（novel en-bloc group），while 79 patients received traditional 2-lobe technique HoLEP（traditional 2-lobe technique group）.There was no significant difference between novel en-bloc group and traditional 2-lobe technique group in the age［（71.0 ± 7.1）years vs.（69.8 ± 6.5）years］，body mass index［（24.5 ± 2.8）kg/m 2 vs.（23.9 ± 3.5）kg/m 2］，international prostate symptom score（IPSS）［26.0（22.0，28.0）vs. 25.0（22.0，28.0）］，quality of life（QOL）score［5.0（5.0，6.0）vs. 5.0（5.0，6.0）］，prostate sepcific antigen（PSA）［4.98（2.40，11.11）ng/ml vs. 4.38（1.62，7.54）ng/ml］and prostate volume［（74.06 ± 42.67）ml vs.（70.10 ± 33.94）ml］（all P > 0.05）. The incidence of acute urinary retention in novel en-bloc group was significantly higher than that in traditional 2-lobe technique group［31.94%（23/72）vs. 17.72%（14/79）， P = 0.042］.The procedure of novel en-bloc was shown as followed：expose the prostatic capsule near the verumontanum and expand the initial capsule plane on both sides. The prostatic urethral mucosa was cut off in a circular pattern medial to the external urethral sphincter，which could form a complete “circular mucosal pad”. Seperate the apical gland along the capsule plane at 12 o’clock and expand the capsule plane until the bladder neck was reached.The bladder neck was then used as a marker so as to separate the glands on both sides along the capsule plane and merge with the initial plane. The entire lobe of the prostate was finally removed along the surgical capsule of the prostate. The procedure of traditional two lobe method was shown as followed：expose the prostatic capsule near the verumontanum and then divide the prostate into two lobes by longitudinal incision at 6 and 12 o’clock. The mucosa was horizontally cut at 12 o’clock，medial to the external urethral sphincter in order to preserve the apical urethral mucosal flap. The twp lobes were then removedd respectively along the capsule layer. The surgery-related indicators，perioperative complications and other data were compared between the two groups，as well as IPSS，QOL score，lower urinary tract symptoms，and the incidence of stress urinary incontinence in the two groups 1 month after surgery. Results:Compared with the patients underwent 2-lobe technique HoLEP，the patients underwent novel en-bloc HoLEP had lower hemoglobin loss［0.50（-5.50，7.50）g/L vs. 7.00（1.00，13.25）g/L， P = 0.003］，lower operation time［（72.06 ± 34.37）min vs.（85.42 ± 40.35）min， P = 0.030］，higher surgical efficacy［（0.72 ± 0.31）g/min vs.（0.55 ± 0.29）g/min， P = 0.002］and lower incidence of stress urinary incontinence one month after operation［2.78%（2/72）vs. 10.13%（8/79）， P = 0.070］. There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative gross hematuria［0 vs. 2.53%（2/79）］，postoperative sepsis［1.39%（1/72）vs. 1.27%（1/79）］，postoperative dysuria［4.17%（3/72）vs. 5.06%（4/79）］，postoperative IPSS improvement［12.0（11.0，13.0）vs. 12.0（10.0，14.0）］and postoperative QOL improvement［3.0（2.0，3.0）vs. 3.0（2.0，3.0）］between the two groups（ P > 0.05）. The patients were further divided into 2 sub-groups according to whether prostate volume ≥ 60 ml or not. In the patients of prostate volume < 60 ml，surgical efficacy was significantly higher in novel en-bloc HoLEP group than that in traditional 2-lobe technique group［（0.55 ± 0.25）g/min vs.（0.41 ± 0.19）g/min， P = 0.028］. In the patients of prostate volume ≥ 60 ml，the surgical efficacy of novel en-bloc HoLEP was also higher［（0.88 ± 0.28）g/min vs.（0.66 ± 0.31）g/min， P = 0.006］. Conclusions:Novel en-bloc HoLEP with complete membranous urethral mucosa sparing technique was demonstrated to has lower blood loss，shorter operation time，higher surgical efficacy and lower incidence of stress urinary incontinence，which is suitable of all sizes of prostate.
