Application of visualized thermosensitive color-changing bolus in postmastectomy radiotherapy for breast cancer
10.3760/cma.j.cn112271-20240808-00301
- VernacularTitle:可视化温感变色补偿膜在乳腺癌根治术后放疗的应用研究
- Author:
Yong WANG
1
;
Yanze SUN
1
;
Wenmin HAN
1
;
Jianjun QIAN
1
;
Peifeng ZHAO
1
;
Liesong CHEN
1
;
Yaqun ZHU
1
;
Ye TIAN
1
Author Information
1. 苏州大学附属第二医院放射治疗科 苏州大学放射肿瘤治疗学研究所 苏州市肿瘤放射治疗学重点实验室，苏州 215004
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Breast cancer;
Postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT);
Visualized;
thermosensitive;
Tissue compensator (bolus)
- From:
Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection
2025;45(5):431-437
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To explore the feasibility and advantages of applying visualized thermosensitive color-changing bolus in postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) for breast cancer.Methods:Forty patients with breast cancer treated with PMRT in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University from June 2023 to June 2024 were prospectively selected. They were randomly divided into test and control groups (also referred to as groups A and B, respectively), with 20 patients in each group. Group A, underwent two CT scans: the first scan without bolus (image A1) and the second scan with visualized thermosensitive color-changing bolus (image A2). They were treated with visualized thermosensitive color-changing bolus. Group B also underwent two CT scans: the first scan without bolus (image B1) and the second scan with conventional commercial bolus (image B2), and then were treated with conventional commercial bolus. In the radiotherapy planning, images A1 and A2 were designed as A1-Plan and A2-Plan, and A3-Plan was created by transferring the A1-Plan onto image A2. Images B1 and B2 were designed as B1-Plan and B2-Plan, and B3-Plan was created by transferring the B1-Plan onto image B2. The radiation fields and target optimization functions were identical. The dosimetric differences and skin toxicity reactions between different plans were compared.Results:In Group A, A1-Plan and A2-Plan manifested no statistically significant differences ( P > 0.05) in the doses to organs at risk (OARs), including the ipsilateral lung ( V5 Gy, V10 Gy, V20 Gy), heart ( Dmean), contralateral breast ( Dmean), and skin ( Dmax and Dmean), target homogeneity index (HI), conformity index (CI), prescription dose volume ( V50 Gy), depth of maximum dose ( Dmax), and monitor unit (MU). In Group B, B3-Plan compared to B1-Plan showed reduced V50 Gy (89.9% vs. 95%), HI (0.153 vs. 0.136), and CI (0.817 vs. 0.810), while the two plans displayed no statistically significant differences in doses to OARs. In contrast, A3-Plan and B3-Plan exhibited statistically significant differences ( t = 2.78, 2.29, -0.47, 0.51, 3.13, P < 0.05) in V50 Gy (94.05% vs. 89.90%), Dmax (5 665.4 cGy vs. 5 632.7 cGy), HI (0.148 vs. 0.163), CI (0.83 vs. 0.82), and skin Dmean (5 153.6 cGy vs. 5 048.2 cGy). Compared to the conventional commercial bolus of the same thickness, the visualized thermosensitive color-changing bolus yielded a significantly reduced air cavity volume (3 833 mm 3vs. 21 498 mm 3,t = -9.65, P < 0.05). Both groups experienced only grade I skin toxicity reactions. Conclusions:Compared to the conventional commercial bolus of the same thickness, the visualized thermosensitive color-changing bolus shows a more effective dosimetric distribution in terms of target coverage, HI, and CI, a higher fit to the skin, highly visualized air cavity, and higher positional repeatability in fractionated radiotherapy, demonstrating high practicality and safety.
