Accuracy of ΔVpeak-CA combined with tidal volume challenge test in predicting fluid responsiveness of patients receiving lung-protective ventilation
10.3760/cma.j.cn131073-20240813-00919
- VernacularTitle:ΔVpeak-CA联合潮气量冲击试验预测保护性肺通气患者容量反应性的准确性
- Author:
Jinqi MA
1
;
Xiaoying WANG
;
Ju GAO
;
Tianfeng HUANG
Author Information
1. 扬州大学附属苏北人民医院麻醉科，扬州 225001
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Carotid arteries;
Blood flow velocity;
Tidal volume;
Lung protective ventilation strategies;
Fluid responsiveness
- From:
Chinese Journal of Anesthesiology
2025;45(9):1185-1190
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To evaluate the accuracy of respiratory variation in carotid artery blood flow peak velocity (ΔVpeak-CA) combined with tidal volume challenge (TVC) test in predicting fluid responsiveness of patients receiving lung-protective ventilation.Methods:Eighty American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status classification Ⅰ-Ⅲ patients of either sex, aged 18-80 yr, with a body mass index of 18-30 kg/m 2, undergoing elective open abdominal surgery with general anesthesia, were selected. Lung-protective strategies were used during surgery: FiO 2 40%, tidal volume (V T) 6 ml/kg (ideal body weight), personalized positive end-expiratory pressure. TVC was conducted at 5 min after hemodynamic stabilization following intubation (T 1): V T was adjusted from 6 ml/kg to 8 ml/kg, lasting for 1 min (T 2), and then V T was decreased to 6 ml/kg. Ultrasound was used to measure ΔVpeak before and after TVC test, and ΔVpeak-CA was calculated. Volume expansion was conducted at 5 min after TVC test, and an increase in cardiac index (△CI≥15%) after volume expansion was considered as positive fluid responsiveness. The patients were divided into fluid responsiveness group (R group) and non-responsiveness group (NR group). The receiver operating characteristic curve was plotted and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was calculated to evaluate the efficiency of ΔVpeak-CA at T 1 (ΔVpeak-CA T 1), ΔVpeak-CA at T 2 (ΔVpeak-CA T 2) and the difference in ΔVpeak-CA between T 1 and T 2 (ΔVpeak-CA T 2-T 1) in predicting fluid responsiveness. Results:Seventy-three patients were finally included in this study, with 45 in R group and 28 in NR group. The AUC of ΔVpeak-CA T 2 in predicting fluid responsiveness was 0.880, with the sensitivity of 0.778 and the specificity of 0.857, and the optimum cut-off value was 14.5%. The AUC of ΔVpeak-CA T 2-T 1 in predicting fluid responsiveness was 0.876, with the sensitivity of 0.667 and the specificity of 0.964, and the optimum cut-off value was 5.5%, and the AUC of ΔVpeak-CA T 1 in predicting fluid responsiveness was only 0.646. Conclusions:ΔVpeak-CA combined with TVC test can accurately predict fluid responsiveness of patients receiving lung-protective ventilation.
