Retrospective analysis of the impact of preconception metabolic and bariatric surgery on maternal and neonatal outcomes
10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20250703-00306
- VernacularTitle:孕前减重代谢手术对母儿结局影响的回顾性分析
- Author:
Xiuyun XU
1
;
Yan ZHOU
;
Ling YANG
;
Ning GU
;
Hang ZHOU
;
Fengjuan JIANG
;
Yimin DAI
Author Information
1. 南京大学医学院附属鼓楼医院妇产医学中心，南京 210008
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Bariatric surgery;
Pregnancy outcome;
Infant, small for gestational age;
Anemia;
Retrospective studies
- From:
Chinese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
2025;60(11):852-859
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To analyze the incidence of pregnancy complications and maternal-neonatal outcomes in women with a history of preconception metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS).Methods:This study was a retrospective cohort study. Pregnant women with singleton pregnancy who delivered in Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, the Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, from September 2019 to December 2024 were selected as the observation subjects. After propensity score matching, 42 women in the MBS group and 157 women in the control group were finally included. The general clinical characteristics, pregnancy status and maternal-neonatal outcomes of the two groups were compared and analyzed.Results:(1) There were no statistically significant differences in the age, proportion of preconception obesity, chronic hypertension, preconception diabetes and primipara between the MBS group and the control group (all P>0.05). The median interval between surgery and pregnancy of pregnant women in the MBS group was 14.0 months (6.0, 27.5 months). Twenty-nine pregnant women (69%, 29/42) were pregnant after 1 year of surgery, and 13 pregnant women (31%, 13/42) were pregnant within 1 year. (2) The levels of hemoglobin, serum iron and triglyceride in the MBS group were significantly lower than those in the control group in the second and third trimester (all P<0.05), but there were no statistically significant differences in the levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, total cholesterol and albumin between the two groups (all P>0.05). (3) Compared with the control group, the incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus in MBS group [21.7% (34/157) vs 7.1% (3/42)] and the proportion of large for gestational age [23.6% (37/157) vs 2.4% (1/42)] were lower; the incidence of anemia [6.4% (10/157) vs 33.3% (14/42)], fetal growth restriction [7.0% (11/157) vs 23.8% (10/42)] and small for gestational age [3.8% (6/157) vs 19.0% (8/42)] were higher; the differences were statistically significant (all P<0.05). There were no significant differences in the cesarean section rate, premature rupture of membranes rate, postpartum hemorrhage ≥1 000 ml rate, gestational age at delivery and preterm birth rate between the two groups (all P>0.05). The neonatal birth weight of the MBS group was significantly lower than that of the control group [(3 044±523) vs (3 256±491) g, P=0.016], but the proportion of neonates with 1-minute Apgar score<7 and the rate of neonatal intensive care unit admission were not statistically significant (all P>0.05). Conclusions:Women who got pregnant after MBS had lower neonatal weight, decreased incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus and large for gestational age, but higher incidence of small for gestational age and anemia in late pregnancy. It is necessary to focus on the nutritional management of pregnant women with MBS before pregnancy, improve anemia, and strengthen the ultrasound follow-up of fetal growth to optimize the perinatal outcome.
