Robotic Versus Traditional Transumbilical Laparoendoscopic Single-site Hysterectomy

Mengchun LI; Jun FENG; Leilei HE; Yueming ZHANG; Jia SHI; Wenjie HOU

Return

Robotic Versus Traditional Transumbilical Laparoendoscopic Single-site Hysterectomy

VernacularTitle:机器人与传统经脐单孔腹腔镜全子宫切除术的对比
Author: Mengchun LI ¹ ; Jun FENG ¹ ; Leilei HE ¹ ; Yueming ZHANG ¹ ; Jia SHI ¹ ; Wenjie HOU ¹
Author Information

1. 苏州大学附属第四医院苏州市独墅湖医院妇产科,苏州 215000
Publication Type:Journal Article
Keywords: Robotic single-site surgery; Transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery; Total hysterectomy
From: Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery 2025;25(9):530-533
CountryChina
Language:Chinese
Abstract: Objective To investigate the safety of robotic single-site hysterectomy(RSSH)for benign diseases.Methods We retrospectively analyzed data of patients who underwent RSSH or traditional transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site hysterectomy(LESSH)for benign indications from May 2024 to May 2025.The study was comprised of 24 patients in the RSSH group and 42 patients in the LESSH group.Perioperative indicators were compared between the two groups.Results All the surgeries were successfully completed in both groups without conversion or intraoperative/postoperative blood transfusion.The RSSH group had a longer operation time than the LESSH group[161.5(131.3,179.5)min vs.97.5(76.5,123.3)min,Z=-5.226,P＜0.001].However,there were no significant differences in intraoperative blood loss,pre-postoperative hemoglobin difference,postoperative pain score,maximum postoperative temperature,time to flatus,indwelling catheter duration,or postoperative hospital stay(P＞0.05).Conclusion RSSH for benign diseases has a safety profile comparable to traditional LESSH.