Expression and clinical significance of low-density granulocytes in peripheral blood of patients with inflammatory bowel disease
10.3760/cma.j.cn101480-20230418-00062
- VernacularTitle:炎症性肠病患者外周血低密度粒细胞的表达及临床意义
- Author:
Nannan ZHU
1
;
Jiejie ZHU
1
;
Qiuyuan LIU
1
;
Jiren WANG
1
;
Hao DING
1
;
Juan WU
1
;
Jing HU
1
;
Wei HAN
1
;
Qiao MEI
1
Author Information
1. 安徽医科大学第一附属医院消化内科,合肥 230022
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Inflammatory bowel disease;
Ulcerative colitis;
Crohn′s disease;
Low-density granulocytes;
Disease activity;
Biological marker
- From:
Chinese Journal of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
2024;08(2):149-155
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To explore the expression level and clinical significance of low-density granulocytes (LDGs) in peripheral blood of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) .Methods:A cross-sectional survey was conducted. Clinical data of IBD patients admitted to the Department of Gastroenterology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University from August 2022 to January 2023 were collected. A total of 45 healthy people were enrolled as the normal control group. Simple endoscopic score for Crohn′s disease (SES-CD) was used to evaluate the activity of Crohn′s disease (CD) and Mayo endoscopic score (MES) was used to evaluate the activity of ulcerative colitis (UC). Laboratory indicators included LDGs, white blood cell count (WBC), hemoglobin (HB), platelet count (PLT), C-reactive protein (CRP), neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and fecal calprotectin (FC). The difference in LDGs level between IBD patients and the normal control group was statistically analyzed and the relationship between LDGs level and clinical characteristics of IBD patients was analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to calculate the predictive value of LDGs for the disease activity of IBD.Results:A total of 130 IBD patients were included, including 83 CD patients and 47 UC. Compared with the normal control group, the LDGs levels of patients in the CD group and UC group were respectively higher[CD: 0.53% (0.32%, 1.41%) vs. 0.19% (0.12%, 0.29%), H= 57.71, P<0.001; UC: 0.87% (0.43%, 1.90%) vs. 0.19% (0.12%, 0.29%), H= 73.23, P<0.001]. Compared with the CD patients in remission phase, the level of LDGs in active CD patients was higher ( P<0.001). Compared with the CD patients in mild activity phase, the LDGs levels of CD patients in moderate and severe activity phases were higher (all P<0.05). In terms of different disease behaviours, the level of LDGs in stricturing CD patients was the highest [1.37% (0.91%, 3.06%), all P<0.05]. Compared with the UC patients in remission phase, the level of LDGs in active UC patients was higher ( P<0.001). Compared with the UC patients in mild activity phase, the LDGs levels of UC patients in moderate and severe activity phases were higher (all P<0.05). In the CD group, LDGs level was positively correlated with CRP, FC, NLR, PLT, simple Crohn′s disease activity index (CDAI), and SES-CD ( r= 0.374, 0.548, 0.345, 0.284, 0.764, 0.721, all P<0.05). In the UC group, LDG levels was positively correlated with CRP, FC, NLR, Sutherland disease activity index (DAI), and MES ( r= 0.325, 0.666, 0.474, 0.638, 0.740, all P<0.05). In CD patients, the cut-off value of LDGs was 0.565%, with the area under curve (AUC) of 0.873, sensitivity of 73.50%, and specificity of 99.30%. In UC patients, the cut-off value of LDGs was 0.545%, with the AUC of 0.877, sensitivity of 76.90%, and specificity of 100.00%. Conclusion:The expression of LDGs in IBD patients is significantly high, which correlates with the disease activity and may be used as a biological marker for the clinical evaluation of IBD patients.