Postoperative outcome analysis of corrective surgery for "Ω"-type severe scoliosis
10.3760/cma.j.cn121113-20241204-00697
- VernacularTitle:"Ω"型严重脊柱侧后凸矫形术的临床疗效
- Author:
Changwei LIU
1
;
Jie LI
1
;
Hui XU
1
;
Zongshan HU
1
;
Yanjie XU
1
;
Zhen LIU
1
;
Yong QIU
1
;
Zezhang ZHU
1
Author Information
1. 南京大学医学院附属鼓楼医院骨科脊柱外科，南京 210008
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Scoliosis;
Kyphosis;
Osteotomy;
Spinal Fusion;
Halo-gravity traction
- From:
Chinese Journal of Orthopaedics
2025;45(15):967-976
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To evaluate the clinical outcomes of corrective surgery in patients with different subtypes of "Ω"-type severe scoliosis.Methods:A retrospective analysis was conducted on 79 patients with "Ω"-type severe scoliosis treated at Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital from August 2010 to July 2020. The cohort included 37 males and 42 females, with a mean age of 21.4±7.4 years (range, 8-52 years). The mean duration of preoperative halo traction was 72.6±27.5 days (range, 14-150 days). Etiologies included congenital scoliosis (33 cases), idiopathic scoliosis (27 cases), Marfan syndrome (9 cases), neurofibromatosis (8 cases), and neuromuscular disorders (2 cases). Based on the classification by Karikari et al., 58 patients were classified as type 2P, 13 as type 2D, and 8 as type 2PD. Outcome measures included coronal and kyphotic Cobb angles, the Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) questionnaire, Oswestry disability index (ODI), and visual analog scale (VAS).Results:All surgical procedures were successfully completed, and all patients were followed up for an average of 27.5±3.9 months (range, 24 to 40 months). The duration of Halo gravity traction was 72.6±27.5 days (range, 14-150 days). In the 2D group, the changes after traction were 26.0°±12.5° for the coronal Cobb angle and 10.1°±7.9° for the kyphotic Cobb angle. In the 2PD group, the traction effect was 13.4°±5.7° for the coronal and 8.3°±5.9° for the kyphotic Cobb angle. In the 2P group, the preoperative coronal Cobb angle was 128.9°±29.1°, postoperative was 84.5°±24.5°, and at the last follow-up was 87.7°±25.0°, yielding a correction rate of 34%±12%. The kyphotic Cobb angle in this group changed from 112.9°±27.1° preoperatively to 77.6°±22.9° postoperatively, and 80.2°±22.8° at the final follow-up, corresponding to a correction rate of 30%±16%. In the 2D group, the coronal Cobb angle was 113.1°±19.9° preoperatively, 71.2°±16.3° postoperatively, and 73.8°±16.3° at the final follow-up, with a correction rate of 37%±11%. The kyphotic Cobb angle in this group was 87.2°±14.0° preoperatively, 61.6°±18.5° postoperatively, and 65.1°±18.5° at the final follow-up, with a correction rate of 31%±22%. In the 2PD group, the coronal Cobb angle improved from 119.6°±29.0° preoperatively to 78.3°±20.8° postoperatively, and 87.0°±23.0° at the last follow-up, corresponding to a correction rate of 35%±8%. The kyphotic Cobb angle in this group was 124.6°±16.8° preoperatively, 82.1°±19.9° postoperatively, and 90.9°±16.9° at the final follow-up, with a correction rate of 33%±16%. At the last follow-up, SRS-22 scores across all four domains had improved in all three groups compared to preoperative values. In the 2PD group, however, the differences in the pain and self-image domains before and after surgery were not statistically significant ( P>0.05), while improvements in the other domains were significant ( P<0.05). No statistically significant differences were observed among the three groups either preoperatively or at the final follow-up ( P>0.05). Conclusion:Combined Halo-gravity traction and spinal corrective surgery are effective in improving both radiographic and functional outcomes in patients with "Ω"-type severe scoliosis. Nonetheless, patients in the 2PD subtype demonstrate reduced traction responsiveness and relatively limited postoperative recovery compared to the 2P and 2D subtypes.
