Comparative efficacy of two osteotomy procedures in medial compartment knee osteoarthritis: anterior popliteus transtibial tuberosity-high tibial osteotomy versus biplanar-high tibial osteotomy
10.3760/cma.j.cn121113-20250122-00067
- VernacularTitle:腘肌前结节中胫骨高位截骨术与双平面胫骨高位截骨术治疗膝内侧间室骨关节炎
- Author:
Zhanyu WU
1
;
Zihao ZOU
;
Jiayuan WU
;
Daizhu YUAN
;
Riguang LIU
;
Xu NING
;
Wei CHAI
;
Chuan YE
Author Information
1. 贵州医科大学附属医院骨科，贵阳 550004
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Knee osteoarthritis;
High tibial osteotomy;
Surgical method innovation;
Clinical effect
- From:
Chinese Journal of Orthopaedics
2025;45(15):993-1001
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the clinical outcomes of APTT-HTO and Biplanar-high tibial osteotomy (Biplanar-HTO) in treating medial compartment knee osteoarthritis.Methods:A non-randomized controlled trial was conducted. Twenty-eight patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis who underwent HTO at the Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University from August 2021 to January 2022 were enrolled. Based on the patients' surgical preference, they were assigned to either the APTT-HTO group ( n=15) or the Biplanar-HTO group ( n=13), followed up for 12 months postoperatively. Postoperative pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores, Knee Society Score (KSS), changes in patellar height (Caton-Deschamps Index, CDI), and posterior tibial slope (PTS) were compared between the two groups. Results:The APTT-HTO group demonstrated a significantly shorter operative time (64.13±4.85 min) compared to the Biplanar-HTO group (81.54±6.09 min) ( P<0.05). No significant differences were observed in intraoperative correction (APTT-HTO: 12.19°±4.85°; Biplanar-HTO: 11.23°±3.02°) or postoperative drainage volume (APTT-HTO: 47.00±13.79 ml; Biplanar-HTO: 47.00±11.17 ml) ( P>0.05). At 12-month follow-up (APTT-HTO: 13.93±2.05 months; Biplanar-HTO: 14.08±2.14 months; no dropouts), the APTT-HTO group showed no significant changes in PTS (9.32°±2.04° vs. preoperative 8.82°±1.89°) or CDI (0.95±0.11 vs. 0.98±0.11) ( P>0.05), while the Biplanar-HTO group exhibited increased PTS (13.27°±1.99° vs. 8.86°±1.99°) and decreased CDI (0.64±0.10 vs. 0.97±0.16) ( P<0.05). The differences in PTS and CDI between the APTT HTO group and the Biplanar HTO group at 12 months after surgery were statistically significant ( P<0.05). Both groups achieved significant clinical improvements: in APTT-HTO, VAS decreased (preopreation 4.80±1.01 to postopreation 1.06±0.88), KSS knee scores increased (47.67±12.03 to 87.93±4.38), and KSS function scores improved (48.00±4.93 to 67.00±5.91); in Biplanar-HTO, VAS reduced (5.08±1.12 to 1.85±1.14), KSS knee scores rose (46.85±11.48 to 85.85±5.11), and KSS function scores enhanced (46.92±5.60 to 66.92±5.22) ( P<0.05 for all). Complications included soft tissue irritation (2 cases per group), with Biplanar-HTO additionally reporting deep vein thrombosis (1 case), hinge fracture (1 case), and patella baja (3 cases). Conclusions:Both APTT-HTO and Biplanar-HTO effectively treat medial compartment knee osteoarthritis. However, APTT-HTO outperforms Biplanar-HTO in preventing postoperative patella infera and minimizing alterations in PTS.
