The diagnostic and clinical value of soluble scavenger receptor class A in rheumatoid arthritis
10.3760/cma.j.cn141217-20241029-00310
- VernacularTitle:可溶性清道夫受体A在类风湿关节炎中的诊断价值及临床意义
- Author:
Hua WEI
1
;
Xin LIU
;
Li MA
;
Pan LIU
;
Wei XIONG
Author Information
1. 江苏省苏北人民医院风湿免疫科，扬州 225009
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Arthritis, rheumatoid;
Seronegative;
Scavenger receptor A;
Disease activity;
Biomarker
- From:
Chinese Journal of Rheumatology
2025;29(6):488-496
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To validate the diagnostic value of soluble scavenger receptor class A (sSRA) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and evaluate the clinical utility of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA) for sSR-A detection.Methods:A total of 200 RA patients (including 37 seronegative RA cases), 19 osteoarthritis (OA) patients, 45 gouty arthritis (GA) patients, and 86 healthy controls (HC) were enrolled from the Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Northern Jiangsu People′s Hospital, between July 2023 and December 2023. Serum sSR-A levels were measured using ELISA and CLIA, and clinical data were collected. Statistical analyses included t-tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, chi-square tests, Fisher′s exact tests, Kruskal-Wallis tests with Dunn′s post hoc analysis, Spearman correlation, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results:ELISA Detection of sSR-A, RA patients exhibited significantly higher sSR-A levels [0.46(0.25, 0.78) ng/ml] than OA [0.15(0.08, 0.30) ng/ml; Z=4.11, P<0.001], GA [0.22(0.14, 0.44) ng/ml; Z=3.51, P<0.01], and HC [0.15(0.06, 0.24) ng/ml; Z=9.10, P<0.001]. ROC curve analysis revealed that sSR-A had a sensitivity of 68.00% and specificity of 89.41% for diagnosing RA, with an area under the curve (AUC)(95% CI) of 0.834 2(0.787 5, 0.880 8) ( P<0.001), and an optimal cut-off value of 0.291 7 ng/ml. The sSR-A positivity rates in RF/ACPA double-positive RA, RF/ACPA single-negative RA, and seronegative RA subgroups were 74.4% (99/133), 56.7% (17/30), and 54.1% (20/37), respectively, with all subgroups showing significantly higher sSR-A levels than HC ( P<0.001). sSR-A correlated positively with DAS28 ( r=0.60, P<0.001), ESR ( r=0.29, P<0.001), globulin ( r=0.25, P<0.001), IgM ( r=0.26, P=0.044), IgG ( r=0.39, P=0.002), IgA ( r=0.31, P=0.017), RF-IgG ( r=0.47, P<0.001), RF-IgA ( r=0.46, P<0.001), RF-IgM ( r=0.50, P <0.001), and ACPA ( r=0.26, P <0.001). sSR-A levels in high-activity [0.85 (0.65, 1.33) ng/ml], moderate-activity [0.46 (0.27, 0.68) ng/ml], and low-activity RA groups [0.24 (0.11, 0.40) ng/ml] were significantly higher than HC [0.15(0.06, 0.24) ng/ml, Z=7.08, P<0.001; Z=7.45, P<0.001; Z=2.68, P<0.001], with levels increasing with disease activity. RA patients were divided into three groups based on ESR and CRP levels including ESR +CRP + [0.54(0.26, 0.87) ng/ml], ESR/CRP - [0.53(0.25, 0.89) ng/ml], and ESR -/CRP - [0.36(0.18, 0.53) ng/ml], All three groups showed significantly higher sSR-A levels compared to the HC group [0.15(0.06, 0.24) ng/ml, Z=8.02, P<0.001; Z=7.61, P<0.001; Z=5.06, P<0.001]. Moreover, sSR-A levels were significantly positively correlated with grayscale synovitis scores ( r=0.30, P<0.001), power Doppler blood flow scores ( r=0.26, P<0.001), and total semi-quantitative ultrasound scores ( r=0.32, P<0.001), patients who were tested positive for sSR-A exhibited significantly higher grayscale synovitis, power Doppler blood flow, and total ultrasound scores compared to those who were negative for sSR-A ( Z=-2.90, P=0.004; Z=-2.37, P=0.018; Z=-3.09, P=0.002). CLIA detection of sSR-A, the RA group [6.83(3.22, 10.65) ng/ml] demonstrated significantly elevated sSR-A concentrations compared to both the OA+GA [1.99(1.27, 4.18) ng/ml] and HC groups [1.03 (0.50, 1.73) ng/ml] ( Z=4.20, P<0.001; Z=9.62, P<0.001). ROC curve analysis revealed AUC (95% CI) of 0.924 6(0.787 5, 0.880 8), with a sensitivity of 86.92% and a specificity of 93.10% for the diagnosis of RA. Conclusion:sSR-A is a reliable biomarker for diagnosing RA, particularly in seronegative patients, and is closely associated with disease activity. CLIA offers superior diagnostic performance over ELISA in detecting sSR-A in RA patients.
