Hybrid fixation with tibial prosthesis in primary total knee arthroplasty in patients with osteoporosis or osteopenia
10.3760/cma.j.cn121113-20250104-00011
- VernacularTitle:胫骨假体混合式固定在骨质疏松症或骨量减低患者初次全膝关节置换术中的应用
- Author:
Zeyu SUN
1
;
Xiaobo ZHU
1
;
Zhiheng LING
1
;
Yihe HU
1
;
Pengfei LEI
1
Author Information
1. 浙江大学附属第一医院骨科关节外科，杭州 310006
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Arthroplasty, replacement, knee;
Osteoporosis;
Pain;
Treatment outcome
- From:
Chinese Journal of Orthopaedics
2025;45(10):670-676
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the efficacy of hybrid fixation with tibial prosthesis in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in patients with osteoporosis or osteopenia.Methods:A total of 39 patients (42 knees) with knee osteoarthritis who underwent primary TKA with hybrid fixation with tibial prosthesis in the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University from November 2022 to June 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 12 males and 27 females with an average age of 68.23±7.02 years (range, 58-89 years). The mean body mass index was 26.15±4.63 kg/m 2 (range, 19.48-39.03 kg/m 2), and the mean bone mineral density T score was -2.38±0.78 (from -4.2 to -1.2). The left knee was 19, and the right knee was 23. The visual analogue scale (VAS) and Knee Society score (KSS) were used to evaluate the knee joint pain and function, and the knee flexion range of motion was measured. Radiographic evaluation included hip-knee-ankle angle, lateral distal femoral angle, and posterior slope of tibial plateau. Results:All patients successfully completed the operation and were followed up for 19.8±5.1 months (range, 4.9-23.6 months). All patients were treated with hybrid fixation with tibial prosthesis assisted by 3D printed porous titanium alloy sleeve. The operation time was 73.8±10.8 min (range, 54-98 min). Thirty-four of 39 patients received standard anti-osteoporosis therapy before operation. The VAS score at the last follow-up was 0(0, 1), which was lower than that before operation 7(6,8), and the difference was statistically significant ( U<0.001, Ρ<0.001). The KSS clinical score at the last follow-up was 76.67±10.04, which was higher than that before operation (50.95±7.35), and the difference was statistically significant ( t=12.030, Ρ<0.001). The knee flexion range of motion at last follow-up was 97.26°±12.94°, showing no significant difference when compared with preoperative 94.52°±16.52° ( t=0.846, Ρ=0.400). The hip-knee-ankle angle at last follow-up was 176.2°±2.54°, which was significantly higher than that before operation 173.5°±5.25° ( t=3.328, Ρ=0.002). The distal lateral femoral and posterior tibial inclination angles at the final follow-up were 89.58°±1.62° and 2.85°±0.91°, respectively, compared with 90.71°±4.01° and 3.05°±1.25° preoperatively, with no statistically significant differences ( t=1.556, Ρ=0.127; t=0.923, Ρ=0.359). No prosthesis loosening, dislocation, periprosthetic infection, deep vein thrombosis and other complications occurred. Conclusion:Hybrid fixation with tibial prosthesis in primary TKA for patients with osteoporosis or osteopenia has a satisfactory clinical effect, which can relieve knee pain and improve joint function.
