Diagnostic value of ultrasound combined with serum tumor markers CEA and CA199 for peritoneal metastasis of gastrointestinal adenocarcinoma
10.3760/cma.j.cn115355-20240627-00316
- VernacularTitle:超声联合血清肿瘤标志物CEA、CA199对胃肠道腺癌腹膜转移的诊断价值
- Author:
Bo ZHANG
1
;
Runqin MIAO
1
;
Shaoling YUAN
1
;
Rongrong GUO
1
;
Jin TANG
1
Author Information
1. 山西省肿瘤医院 中国医学科学院肿瘤医院山西医院 山西医科大学附属肿瘤医院超声科，太原 030013
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Gastrointestinal neoplasms;
Adenocarcinoma;
Ultrasonography;
Neoplasm metastasis;
Peritoneum;
Carcinoembryonic antigen;
Carbohydrate antigen 199
- From:
Cancer Research and Clinic
2024;36(12):938-941
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To explore the diagnostic value of ultrasound combined with tumor markers carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen 199 (CA199) for peritoneal metastasis of gastrointestinal adenocarcinoma.Methods:A retrospective case series study was conducted. A total of 140 patients with gastrointestinal adenocarcinoma who were admitted to Shanxi Province Cancer Hospital from August 2021 to January 2023 were collected. Preoperative diagnosis of peritoneal metastasis was performed using tumor markers CEA and CA199 (tumor marker method) and ultrasound combined with CEA and CA199 (combined method). Using postoperative pathological results as the gold standard, the detection rate and diagnostic efficacy of the two methods for peritoneal metastasis in patients were compared.Results:Among 140 patients, there were 78 males and 62 females; the age was (59±5) years old; there were 40 cases of gastric cancer and 100 cases of colorectal cancer; pathological staging: 4 cases in stage Ⅰ, 36 cases in stage Ⅱ, 52 cases in stage Ⅲ, and 48 cases in stage Ⅳ. All patients underwent radical resection surgery, and postoperative pathological results showed that 32 cases (22.86%) had peritoneal metastasis. The detection rate of combined method for peritoneal metastasis of gastrointestinal adenocarcinoma was higher than that of tumor marker method [96.88% (31/32) vs. 78.13% (25/32)], but the difference was not statistically significant ( χ2 = 5.14, P = 0.059). The sensitivity of tumor marker method for diagnosing peritoneal metastasis of gastrointestinal adenocarcinoma was 64.00%, the specificity was 86.09%, the positive predictive value was 50.00%, the negative predictive value was 91.67%, the Kappa value was 0.379, and the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.793. The sensitivity of combined method for diagnosing peritoneal metastasis of gastrointestinal adenocarcinoma was 77.42%, the specificity was 92.66%, the positive predictive value was 75.00%, the negative predictive value was 93.52%, the Kappa value was 0.905, and the AUC was 0.985. The sensitivity and positive predictive value of combined method for diagnosing peritoneal metastasis of gastrointestinal adenocarcinoma were higher than those of tumor marker method, and the differences were statistically significant ( χ2 values were 4.06 and 13.33, both P < 0.05). Conclusions:Ultrasound combined with serum tumor markers CEA and CA199 has high diagnostic value for peritoneal metastasis of gastrointestinal adenocarcinoma.
