Comparison of the efficacy and safety of nanomicroneedle- versus ultrasound-mediated delivery of tranexamic acid for the treatment of melasma: a randomized controlled study
- VernacularTitle:纳米微针与超声波导入氨甲环酸治疗黄褐斑的疗效与安全性比较：一项随机对照研究
- Author:
Jiemin ZHONG
1
;
Wei LI
1
;
Shujuan ZHANG
1
;
Yan YANG
1
;
Rujun XUE
1
;
Xinyi LI
1
;
Yanan KE
1
;
Xiaoyin CHEN
1
;
Quan CHEN
1
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords: Chloasma; Therapy; Tranexamic acid; Nanomicroneedles; Ultrasonic induction; Nanocrystalline microneedles; Transdermal drug delivery
- From: Chinese Journal of Dermatology 2025;58(9):829-833
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
- Abstract: Objective:To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of nanomicroneedle- versus ultrasound-mediated delivery of tranexamic acid for the treatment of melasma.Methods:A prospective, randomized, controlled study was conducted. Patients with melasma were collected from the Department of Dermatology, Guangzhou Dermatology Hospital from March 2023 to May 2024, and divided into a nanomicroneedle group (receiving nanomicroneedle-mediated delivery of tranexamic acid) and an ultrasound group (receiving ultrasound-mediated delivery of tranexamic acid) using the random number table method. Both groups underwent the treatment once a week for a total of 8 sessions. At week 12, outcomes including melasma area and severity index (MASI) scores, treatment response rates, VISIA brown spot scores, pain scores, and adverse reactions were evaluated and compared between the two groups. Statistical analyses were carried out using two-independent-sample t test, Mann-Whitney U test, and chi-square test. Results:A total of 80 patients with melasma were included, with 40 in each group. In the nanomicroneedle group, the patients were aged 40.35 ± 7.39 years (range: 25 - 55 years), with the disease duration being 8.45 ± 4.77 months (range: 1 - 16 months) ; in the ultrasound group, the patients were aged 40.25 ± 7.76 years (range: 25 - 55 years), and their disease duration was 10.45 ± 5.07 months (range: 2 - 17 months) ; there were no significant differences in ages or disease duration between the two groups (both P > 0.05). At week 12, both groups demonstrated reduced MASI scores compared to baseline scores, and the MASI scores were significantly lower in the nanomicroneedle group ( M[ Q1, Q3]: 5.80[4.20, 9.35]) than in the ultrasound group (8.65[5.70, 10.80], Z = 2.50, P = 0.012). The overall response rate was significantly higher in the nanomicroneedle group (97.5%, 39/40) than in the ultrasound group (55.0%, 22/40; χ2 = 19.95, P < 0.001). The lateral facial VISIA brown spot scores were also significantly lower in the nanomicroneedle group (left side: 126.18 ± 36.54 points; right side: 138.50 ± 40.76 points) than in the ultrasound group (left side: 142.37 ± 32.40 points; right side: 157.13 ± 39.59 points; t = -2.10, -2.07, P = 0.039, 0.041, respectively). In the nanomicroneedle group, the pain scores were 4.12 ± 1.47 points, and varying severity of adverse reactions such as erythema, edema and dryness occurred after operation, all of which resolved spontaneously within 48 hours. No marked adverse reactions were observed in the ultrasound group. Conclusion:Nanomicroneedle-mediated delivery of tranexamic acid demonstrated superior clinical efficacy and favorable safety profiles compared to the ultrasound-mediated delivery, providing more options for the treatment of melasma.
