Analysis of the therapeutic effect of arthroscopic release of lateral patellofemoral retinaculum combined with medial patellofemoral ligament compression surgery for moderate to severe patellofemoral arthritis
10.3760/cma.j.cn115455-20250123-00096
- VernacularTitle:膝关节镜下髌股外侧支持带松解联合内侧髌股韧带紧缩术治疗中重度髌股关节炎的疗效分析
- Author:
Daoxiong LI
1
;
Qiongmei ZHANG
;
Yefeng ZHAO
;
Haijun XIAO
Author Information
1. 锦州医科大学上海市奉贤区中心医院研究生培养基地骨科，上海 200000
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Patellofemoral joint;
Knee arthroscopy;
Release of lateral patellofemoral retinaculum;
Medial patellofemoral ligament compression surgery
- From:
Chinese Journal of Postgraduates of Medicine
2025;48(9):816-822
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To analyze the efficacy of arthroscopic release of the lateral patellofemoral retinaculum (LPR) combined with medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) compression for the treatment of moderate to severe patellofemoral arthritis.Methods:A prospective study method was used to select 101 patients with moderate to severe patellofemoral arthritis who were admitted to the Jinzhou Medical University Shanghai Fengxian District Central Hospital from January 2021 to December 2023. They were randomly divided into group A (50 cases, LPR release surgery under knee arthroscopy) and group B (51 cases, LPR release surgery combined with MPFL compression surgery under knee arthroscopy). Perioperative indexes, pain degree of patellofemoral joint, patellofemoral trajectory correction, knee joint function and patellofemoral joint function were compared between the two groups before and 6 months after surgery.Results:During the study period, both group A and group B were excluded or separated, and ultimately 47 and 49 patients were enrolled in group A and group B, respectively. The operation time of group B was longer than that of group A: (35.27 ± 3.09) min vs. (25.64 ± 2.66) min, with statistically significant differences ( P<0.05). Six months after surgery, both groups experienced a reduction in pain, with group B being milder than group A: no pain 75.51% (37/49) vs. 44.68% (21/47), mild pain 24.49% (12/49) vs. 38.30% (18/47), moderate pain 0 vs. 14.89% (7/47), and severe pain 0 vs. 2.13% (1/47). The difference was statistically significant ( P<0.05). Six months after surgery, the patellofemoral adaptation angle, patellofemoral tilt angle, and patellofemoral lateral displacement distance in both groups decreased, and group B was smaller than group A: (8.02 ± 1.62)° vs. (10.35 ± 1.54)°, (8.71 ± 1.08)° vs. (10.85 ± 0.75)°, 1.00 (1.00, 1.00) mm vs. 1.00 (1.00, 1.00) mm, with statistically significant differences ( P<0.05). Both groups showed an increase in Lysholm knee score scale and patellar Kujala score, with group B being higher than group A: (89.92 ± 4.02) points vs. (84.21 ± 5.65) points and (89.18 ± 2.57) points vs. (87.40 ± 3.38) points, with statistically significant differences ( P<0.05). Conclusions:Arthroscopic release of LPR combined with MPFL compression surgery is more effective in treating moderate to severe patellofemoral arthritis than arthroscopic release of LPR. It can improve the correction of patellofemoral trajectory, reduce pain, and facilitate the recovery of knee and patellar joint function.
